Україна | Ukraine 🇺🇦

1464 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Ukraine!

Ласкаво просимо в Україну!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
76
 
 

October 2, 2023

Today, the United States and Denmark announced their partnership to reduce cybersecurity vulnerabilities and build cyber resilience in Ukraine’s critical infrastructure through the USAID Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructure in Ukraine activity. Denmark is investing $2.8 million (20 million DKK) in the activity.

Since 2014 and particularly since the run-up to its brutal, full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the Russian Federation has targeted cyberattacks against Ukraine’s government institutions and critical infrastructure such as telecommunications, electricity, and data storage systems. The United States, with this new support from Denmark, will continue its work to strengthen Ukraine’s cybersecurity enabling environment, including its laws, regulations, and institutional frameworks; develop Ukraine’s cybersecurity workforce, including building the capacity of existing experts and by developing a dedicated cybersecurity workforce pipeline; and by building trust and collaboration between the public and sectors to form a more resilient Ukrainian cybersecurity industry.

“Strengthening Ukraine’s cyber capabilities is critical to protecting the country’s institutions and infrastructure against the increased cyber attacks resulting from Russia’s war. I welcome Denmark’s $2.8m investment in the USAID Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructure in Ukraine activity and look forward to working together to enable Ukraine to withstand Russia’s cyber aggression” – United States Ambassador to Ukraine, Bridget Brink.

“There is a great need to build a more resilient digital infrastructure in Ukraine. Russia uses cyber attacks to disrupt critical infrastructure and undermine trust in authoriti. This is why we will contribute 20 million DKK (2.8 million USD) towards Ukrainian cybersecurity in close collaboration with the U.S.” – Lars Løkke Rasmussen, Danish Minister of Foreign Affairs.

The United States, through USAID’s Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructure in Ukraine activity, has been essential for providing state institutions and key infrastructure with the tools and cyber expertise they need to keep running and to meet the needs of the Ukrainian people during the war. The activity has also supported Ukraine’s efforts to form partnerships with international cybersecurity actors, including Ukraine’s State Service for Special Communication and Information Protection launching cooperation with the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

The United States is proud to partner with Denmark and New Zealand through the USAID Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructure in Ukraine activity, and looks forward to our continued collaboration. Through its contribution, Denmark underscores its support for the Ukrainian people and their security against cybersecurity attacks from malign actors. The donation also builds on New Zealand’s investment of $0.49 million in the cybersecurity program earlier in 2023.

By U.S. Embassy Kyiv | 2 October, 2023

77
 
 

Ruble Sinks Back to 100 Versus Dollar in New Headache for Russia

Have a confidential tip for our reporters? Get in Touch Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal LEARN MORE By Bloomberg News 3 October 2023

The ruble depreciated near 100 per dollar again, briefly crossing an important psychological mark for Russian consumers and the government after past efforts by policymakers failed to arrest the currency's decline.

Russia's currency weakened as much as 0.5% to 100.255 against the greenback before trading at 99.94 as of 7:22 a.m. in Moscow on Tuesday. The drop returned it to a threshold that triggered an emergency interest-rate hike in August and prompted fierce discussion about possible capital control measures to bolster the ruble.

78
 
 

How Orban copied Putin in extorting foreign companies with selective taxes & rules forcing them to leave and handing them over to friendly oligarchs for pennies on the dollar

79
80
 
 

Trying To Turn Ukraine Into ‘Neutral’ Finland Or Austria Would Be A Disaster

By Robert Farley Published 1 day ago

Can we turn Ukraine into Austria? Or perhaps Finland?

Along with a host of others, former Greek Minister of Finance Yannis Varoufakis has argued that the foundation for peace between Russia and Ukraine lies in the neutralization of the latter. And many in Europe and North America might prefer an outcome that soothes the conscience and allows Ukraine to maintain a degree of independence from Russia, however shadowy. Fortunately or no, the comparisons don’t hold up; trying to turn Ukraine into Cold War Austria or Cold War Finland is bound to lead to disaster.

Turn Ukraine Into Austria? In the wake of World War II, the Allied powers detached Austria from Germany and divided it into four occupation zones. In 1955, Austria signed a treaty that ended this occupation but left the country permanently neutral and largely demilitarized. Austrian democracy survived and the Austrian economy thrived, despite the fact that Vienna became well-known as a venue for spy-on-spy conflicts during the Cold War.

Austria’s example would be relevant, but for two factors; Austria was a conquered (and guilty) combatant at the end of World War II, and Austria was not regarded as strategically consequential for the security of any of the European great powers. Unlike Ukraine, Austria had enthusiastically participated in a brutal war of extermination against Jews and Slavs on the Eastern Front.

While the Allies officially regarded Austria as a victim of Nazi aggression, it was also well-understood that many or most Austrians had joined the war willingly on the German side.

Critical to the legitimacy of the neutralization of Austria was the idea that the Austrians deserved what they got for their participation in the Nazi war machine. This belief was deeply held by the Soviets, but also extended to the Western Allies and even to the Austrians themselves. The Ukrainians (and most of their allies) understand themselves as victims of aggression rather than its perpetrators, resulting in a vastly different rhetorical environment.

Also, unlike the Ukrainian situation, Russia did not regard control of Austria as crucial to either its security or identity. Russian President Vladimir Putin made clear in his speech at the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine War that the stakes were not limited to security; they very much included Russia’s natural right to a sphere of influence in what Putin regarded as Russia’s ancestral lands.

This would put a neutral, disarmed Ukraine is a far more perilous position than Cold War Austria.

Can Ukraine Become Finland? The USSR invaded Finland (a former territory of the Russian Empire) as part of the Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939. While the Finns performed well in the first months of the Winter War, they were later forced to conclude a peace with the USSR.

When war broke out again in June 1941, Finland joined the Nazi cause and attempted to regain its lost territories, only to be forced into another surrender in September 1944. As with Austria, the USSR was able to impose an arrangement upon Finland because Finland, having thrown in its lot with the Nazis, was on the losing side of a catastrophic war.

Finland wasn’t quite in the same position as Austria (Finland’s war policy was quite measured, and generally speaking Finns avoided participating in the Holocaust), but nevertheless, the albatross of Nazi collaboration hung heavy over the country.

Finland was allowed to retain its democratic institutions and mostly allowed to govern its internal affairs. Finland’s latitude in foreign and security policies was sharply curtailed, however. Nor was Finland completely free to manage its affairs; the looming threat of Russian intervention had a negative impact on Finnish speech, literature, film, and culture, in large part because of the fear and reality of government censorship.

Finally, it’s worth noting that the Finns loved Finlandization so much that Finland immediately applied for NATO membership as soon as this war began.

What Will Kyiv Do? The USSR and the Western Allies imposed neutrality on Austria and Finland through force of arms. This imposition carried with it the legitimacy not simply of might makes right, but also of the extermination of the foulest regime to disgrace the modern historical record. Moreover, the Finns and the Austrians (to different degree) accepted the justice of this verdict.

Ukrainians will not accept this judgment. They do not believe that they have done anything wrong, and do not believe that their sovereignty should be abrogated out of concern for the convenience of their next door neighbor. They do not believe that Russia will refrain from military, political, and economic intervention in Ukraine in the future.

Analysts who style themselves “realist” seem to like the idea of Ukrainian neutrality; it recognizes Russia’s right to a sphere of influence and reduces the American commitment to the region, goals that the anti-engagement school has long treasured. But these “realists” might as well ask for a dozen Shield helicarriers and a battalion of unicorns. Forcing Ukraine to accept “neutrality” after suffering substantial territorial losses to Russia in 2014 was a no-go; Kyiv had lost any trust that it had in Moscow’s intentions.

The situation today is much worse; Ukrainians across the society actively hate Russia and Russians, and will not accept an agreement that reduces or eliminates Ukraine’s ability to protect itself. “Realists” should take time to think through the actual dynamics of the political and military situation between Ukraine and Russia before holding forth on how to restrain and constrain Ukraine.

81
 
 

will not copy the charts but will copy all the text

How much aid the U.S. has sent to Ukraine, in 6 charts World Oct 1, 2023 9:14 PM EDT Every year, the United States sends billions of dollars in aid — and much more than any other country — to beneficiaries around the world in pursuit of its security, economic, and humanitarian interests.

Heading into 2022, U.S. foreign assistance was driven by various priorities of the Biden administration, including combating climate change, responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, and countering authoritarianism. But since Russia’s invasion in February of that year, Ukraine has become far and away the top recipient of U.S. foreign aid. It’s the first time that a European country has held the top spot since the Harry S. Truman administration directed vast sums into rebuilding the continent through the Marshall Plan after World War II.

WATCH: Ukraine’s Zelenskyy gives address at U.S. National Archives during visit to Washington

Since the war began, the Biden administration and the U.S. Congress have directed more than $75 billion in assistance to Ukraine, which includes humanitarian, financial, and military support, according to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a German research institute. (This figure does not include all war-related U.S. spending, such as aid to allies.) The historic sums are helping a broad set of Ukrainian people and institutions, including refugees, law enforcement, and independent radio broadcasters, though most of the aid has been military-related. Dozens of other countries, including most members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the European Union, are also providing large aid packages to Ukraine.

Much of the aid has gone toward providing weapons systems, training, and intelligence that Ukrainian commanders need to defend against Russia, which has one of the world’s most powerful militaries. Many Western analysts say the military aid provided by the United States and other allies has played a pivotal role in Ukraine’s defense and counteroffensive against Russia. U.S. and allied leaders consider Russia’s invasion a brutal and illegal war of aggression on NATO’s frontier that, if successful, would subjugate millions of Ukrainians; encourage Russian President Vladimir Putin’s revanchist aims; and invite similar aggression from other rival powers, especially China.

NATO allies are particularly wary of being pulled directly into the hostilities, which would dramatically raise the risk of a nuclear war. However, as the fighting has progressed, many donor governments have shed their reluctance to give Ukraine more sophisticated assets, such as battle tanks and modern fighter aircraft. In the summer of 2023, the United States agreed to allow its European allies to train Ukrainian pilots to operate U.S.-made F-16s and to eventually have those allies supply the warplanes to Kyiv.

Nineteen months into the war, the Biden administration had provided or agreed to provide Ukraine with a long list of defense capabilities, including Abrams battle tanks, anti-aircraft missiles, coastal defense ships, and advanced surveillance and radar systems. In July, the Biden administration sparked some controversy in agreeing to supply Ukraine with cluster munitions, which are banned by most countries because of the risk their undetonated components can pose to civilians many years after their use.

82
 
 

UNDERSTANDING THE RUSSO-UKRAINIAN WAR: A GUIDE FROM WAR ON THE ROCKS We at War on the Rocks have curated this list of articles and podcasts to help you gain a deeper understanding of the history, drivers, background, and events of Russia’s massive assault on Ukraine. Whether you are a soldier or a student, a policymaker or a pundit, a teacher or a techie, this will be useful for you.

Critically, these offerings help place the conflict in the broader context of relations and confrontations between Russia and the West. These resources go back to 2014 and are organized by focus: strategy and the military balance, diplomacy, history, resistance, nuclear weapons and arms control, cyber, energy, Russian politics, and more. This list will be updated regularly.

Editor’s note: To mark the one-year anniversary of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, we have updated this guide with all of our material that can help you better understand the conflict.

83
84
85
 
 

Recap Deployment Map changes – Week 39 zhutatko –

October 1, 2023

The weekly recap of the latest unit changes on our Deployment map.

Collection of the most significant changes on our Deployment map during the past week. All information based on publicly available sources.

Kupyansk Axis 44th Mechanized Brigade was redeployed to Kupyansk axis to reinforce Ukrainian defense in the north. (source) 42nd Mechanized Brigade was redeployed to Kupyansk axis as well. (source) Bakhmut axis Given the recent release of training videos by 57th Motorized Brigade, it seems the brigade was withdrawn from the front. (source) 93rd Mechanized Brigade, at least partly, returned to the front south of Bakhmut. (source) Velyka Novosilka axis 21st Brigade of National Guard was redeployed to this direction and is performing tasks in the vicinity of Urozhaine. (source) 31st Brigade of National Guard was also redeployed to this direction. Previously, this unit fought in the Kreminna area. (source) There are indications that 37th Marine Brigade and part of 36th Marine Brigade were withdrawn from the front and redeployed elsewhere. * 58th Motorized Brigade has returned to the front and is now deployed to the area of the previously withdrawn 37th Marine Brigade. * 35th Marine Brigade relocated to the area of Novomaiorske. * Tokmak axis 132nd Reconaissance Battalion was deployed to the southern front. * Kherson axis Just recently formed 48th Separate Assault Battalion has been deployed to Kherson Oblast. (source) Our Deployment Map has been updated to reflect the changes above.

Data marked with * come from public Facebook groups of Ukrainian volunteers asking for support, a list of captured soldiers, and so on. Due to possible personal data available at the source such as name etc., the links are hidden and can be provided on demand if requested.

86
 
 

GeoConfirmed UKR.

"Construction of "Dragon's Teeth" fortifications in the North direction from the highway, ~16 km NorthEast of north end of Feodosia, Crimea"

note: this is a very remarkable location: the East side of Crimea. 2,5km long from N to S. Why?

87
 
 

Russia's largest air carrier had three planes break down in a day

Due to technical failures, the planes could not take off on time. The Boeing 777 airplane of the Russian company Aeroflot could not take off from Phuket to Moscow due to damaged landing gear. Also, 400 Aeroflot passengers who were going to Turkey were stuck in Moscow.

88
 
 

Anna from Ukraine is an amazing vlogger from Ukraine with loads of nice videos in her channel in YouTube

89
2
Borrell (twitter.com)
submitted 2 years ago by AJB_l4u@lemm.ee to c/ukraine@lemmy.ml
 
 

Borrell: ▪️EU plans to train 40,000 Ukrainian soldiers in the coming months ▪️We are ready to provide Ukraine with long-term support in order to resist the destabilization arranged by Russia

90
 
 

"Moldova is no longer going to buy gas from Gazprom", - the country's Energy Minister

Now the country will buy fuel in Europe. Instead, the Kremlin said that Gazprom's contract with Moldova is still valid.

91
 
 

VISUAL INVESTIGATIONS

Russia May Be Planning to Test a Nuclear-Powered Missile Visual evidence from a remote base in the Arctic shows launch preparations mirroring those that preceded earlier tests.

Oct. 2, 2023, 5:01 a.m. ET Satellite imagery and aviation data suggest that Russia may be preparing to test an experimental nuclear-powered cruise missile — or may have recently tested one — with a theoretical range of thousands of miles.

Movements of aircraft and vehicles at and near a base in Russia’s remote Arctic region are consistent with preparations that were made for tests of the missile, known as the Burevestnik or SSC-X-9 Skyfall, in 2017 and 2018, according to a New York Times analysis.

U.S. surveillance planes have also been tracked in the area over the last two weeks, and aviation alerts have warned pilots to avoid nearby airspace.

Russia previously conducted 13 known tests between 2017 and 2019, all of which were unsuccessful, according to a report from the Nuclear Threat Initiative, a nonprofit group focused on arms control. And mishaps can be deadly. A missile launched in 2019 crashed and eventually exploded during a recovery attempt, killing seven people, according to U.S. officials.

“It is exotic — it is dangerous in its testing and development phase,” Daryl G. Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association, said. Whether the Burevestnik has been tested again since 2019 isn’t clear, but even with a successful launch, the missile would still be years away from “operational deployment,” Mr. Kimball added.

In previous tests, the missile failed to fly a distance anywhere close to the designed range, estimated to be around 14,000 miles. U.S. officials assessed that during its most successful test flight, lasting just more than two minutes, the missile flew 22 miles before crashing into the sea. In another test, the missile’s nuclear reactor failed to activate, causing it to go down only a few miles from the launch site. For a test to succeed, the missile’s nuclear reactor would need to initiate in flight, so that the missile can cover much more ground.

More on Russia Viktor Bout’s New Life: As an arms trafficker, he became one of the world’s most wanted men. But now, months after returning to Russia in a prisoner exchange, the “Merchant of Death” is reinventing himself — as a local politician. Yevgeny Prigozhin’s Death: The death of the mercenary leader has spurred a shadowy fight for control of his sprawling interests among major players in Russia’s power structure. A Pessimistic View: Ksenia Sobchak, a well-known Russian media personality and liberal politician, has embraced the fatalistic stance that resistance to the Kremlin is futile. Some liberals call her a stooge, while hawks see her as disloyal. Putin’s Forever War: The conflict in Ukraine is hardly felt in Moscow. How long the toll can be obscured could determine the fate of the Russian leader and his country. Follow our coverage of the war here. Visual Investigations Our investigative journalists use evidence that's hidden in plain sight to present a definitive account of the news. Get an email as soon as our next Visual Investigation is published. Get it sent to your inbox. According to the Nuclear Threat Initiative report, the missile is a “second-strike, strategic-range weapon,” intended to be launched after a wave of nuclear strikes have devastated targets in Russia. The missile could carry a conventional warhead but, in practice, would likely carry a nuclear payload, albeit a smaller one than most other nuclear-capable weapons. If used in wartime, the missile could have the potential to destroy large urban areas and military targets, experts say.

While Russia has shared little about the Burevestnik’s specific design, President Vladimir V. Putin has said it is nuclear-powered. The missile is thought to be launched by a solid-fuel rocket motor before a small nuclear reactor activates in flight, theoretically allowing the missile to stay aloft indefinitely.

16 Dishes to Make for Someone Going Through a Hard Time The Burevestnik is one of six strategic weapons, along with others such as the Kinzhal ballistic missile and the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle, that Mr. Putin introduced in a 2018 speech. He asserted that the weapons could overpower and outmaneuver existing U.S. defenses. Addressing the West, he said, “You have failed to contain Russia.”

Visual evidence of testing preparations includes before-and-after satellite images.

Imagery taken on the morning of Sept. 20 shows numerous vehicles present on a launchpad at the base, including a truck with a trailer that appears to correspond to the dimensions of the missile. A weather shelter that typically covers the specific launch site had been moved about 50 feet. By the afternoon, the trailer was gone and the shelter was moved back to its original position.

Additional imagery captured on Sept. 28 shows the launchpad active again, with a similar trailer present and the shelter again drawn back.

On Aug. 31, the Russian authorities issued an aviation notice for a “temporary danger area,” advising pilots to avoid part of the Barents Sea off the coast and 12 miles from the launch site, known as Pankovo. The notice has since been extended several times and, as of Sunday, was scheduled to be in force through Oct. 6. Russia issued a similar notice before a Burevestnik test in 2019.

Additionally, two Russian aircraft specifically used for collecting data from missile launches were parked about 100 miles south of the launch site in early August, at the Rogachevo air base, according to analysis of satellite images by Bellona, a Norwegian environmental organization. The aircraft are owned by Rosatom, the Russian atomic energy company. They remained at that base at least through Sept. 26, according to additional satellite imagery. During Burevestnik tests in 2018, aircraft of the same type were also in the vicinity.

A U.S. Air Force reconnaissance aircraft, an RC-135W Rivet Joint, also flew at least two missions off the coast of the Arctic island where the launch site is, on Sept. 19 and Sept. 26, according to the tracking platform Flightradar24. The two missions represented a slight uptick from usual known activity.

The highly secretive nature of the Burevestnik missile initiative and the remote launch location make it difficult to determine if a test is forthcoming or if the weapon may have already been recently retested — or perhaps both. While launch tests of the Burevestnik have been conducted at the Arctic base in the past, Russia could also test just the missile’s rocket motor or a component of the missile itself.

The White House declined to comment on The Times’s findings.

Experts said the missile is dangerous not only in its ability to carry a powerful nuclear warhead but in its potential to release harmful radioactive emissions if the missile were to explode or malfunction during a test.

If put into use, the Burevestnik would be considered part of Russia’s nuclear arsenal, making it subject to a nuclear arms reduction treaty that Moscow signed in 2011. That agreement limits the total number of warheads and delivery vehicles the country can deploy.

But with the treaty, known as New START, set to expire in February 2026, the missile could contribute to “the leading edge of an uncontrolled arms race” if no new agreement were to replace the expiring treaty, Mr. Kimball said.

Ultimately, he said, a test of the missile would be a “sign that Russia is moving in the wrong direction.”

92
93
 
 

Hopefully winter uniforms. Also a pretty good sign Russia is at the point of partisan movements claiming credits for attacks against military targets.

94
 
 

NACP removed the Hungarian OTR Bank from the list of international sponsors of the war

The National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption removed the Hungarian OTR Bank from the list of international sponsors of the war. NAZK reports this on Twitter.

The department's statement says that during the discussions that took place over the past few days with the participation of the European External Action Service, the bank made a number of commitments regarding its future plans on the Russian market.

According to NAZK, having fulfilled its part of the agreements, the department excluded the bank from the list of international sponsors of the war.

"NAZK expects that OTP Bank will comply with the reached agreement without delay," the message reads.

Hungary, on the other hand, stated that Ukraine's temporary exclusion of the Hungarian OTP Bank from the list of "international war sponsors" in an attempt to unblock EU military aid does not significantly change the situation.

We will remind you that Hungary is currently the biggest obstacle in the European Union's attempt to help Ukraine.

On May 4, the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption (NACP) added the Hungarian OTP Bank to the list of international sponsors of the war. This decision was made due to the position of the bank's management to continue operations in Russia and the actual recognition of the so-called Donetsk and Luhansk "people's republics". After that, Hungary began to block tranches for Ukraine in exchange for the exclusion of OTP Bank from the list of war sponsors.

95
 
 

Russia lacks sufficient air defence systems so is redeploying them from Far East – Ukraine's Defence Intelligence TETYANA OLIYNYK — MONDAY, 2 OCTOBER 2023

Ukraine’s Defence Intelligence has said that events in Russia indicate that it lacks sufficient air defence systems of its own and is transferring them from [Russia’s] Far East.

Source: Andrii Yusov, representative of Defence Intelligence of Ukraine, on the 24/7 national joint newscast

Quote: "Events in Moscow itself, or in Bryansk or Kursk oblasts, show that the enemy does not have enough air defence systems to protect its territory. And they are being forced to redeploy air defence systems from other places, in particular from the Far East.

This is a reason for the military-political command and, above all, for Russian society itself to think about what is more important to them: to place air defence systems in the temporarily occupied territories or to cover their own."

96
 
 

EU proposes €5bn military aid package for Ukraine after ‘historic’ meeting Josep Borrell condemns ‘inhumane’ Russia as bloc offers training for soldiers and fighter jet pilots

Ukraine is set to receive billions of euros more in military aid, as well as training for fighter pilots, the EU’s top diplomat has said, after a “historic” meeting of EU foreign ministers in Kyiv.

Josep Borrell, the EU’s high representative for foreign affairs, said on Monday the 27-nation bloc remained committed to helping Ukraine defeat a “brutal and inhumane” Russia.

“I don’t see any member state faltering,” he said, reinforcing a declaration by the Nato secretary general, Jens Stoltenberg, on Friday that he was confident Slovakia and Poland would continue to support the fight against Russia despite political wavering in both countries.

Borrell said the EU had proposed a “bilateral envelope” worth €5bn (£4.3bn) for Ukraine’s armed forces. EU countries would train 40,000 soldiers, provide “special training” for fighter pilots and deepen ties between EU and Ukrainian defence companies.

His comments came after EU foreign ministers held talks with Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy. Apart from meetings at the United Nations, it was the first time they had gathered outside EU territory and the first informal summit to take place in a war zone, Borrell said.

The meeting “sent a strong message of solidarity and support”, he added, more than 18 months after Russia’s full-scale invasion. Ukraine was fighting for survival in the face of an “unjust and illegitimate” attack, he said.

Borrell called Vladimir Putin’s assault an “existential threat” for Europeans. He said Russia had attacked Odesa minutes after he left the Black Sea port city on Saturday. Addressing Moscow directly, he said: “We will not be intimidated by your missiles and drones.”

The pledge of further EU military assistance will cheer Ukraine’s government after a bumpy few days, characterised by external political setbacks. On Sunday, Joe Biden, the US president, pressed congressional Republicans to back a deal to provide more aid to Ukraine after provisions for Kyiv were left out of a bill to avoid a US government shutdown.

In Slovakia, meanwhile, a pro-Russian populist party won the most votes in an election on Saturday. Ukraine’s foreign minister, Dmytro Kuleba, said it was too early to say what impact the vote in Slovakia might have. He played down the row in the US Congress, driven by hard-right Republicans, describing it as an “incident”.

Kuleba said: “We don’t feel that the US support has been shattered … because the United States understands that what is at stake in Ukraine is much bigger than just Ukraine, it’s about the stability and predictability of the world. And therefore I believe that we’ll be able to find the necessary solutions.”

Russia-Ukraine war: Ukrainian victory depends on cooperation with Europe, Zelenskiy tells EU foreign ministers in Kyiv – as it happened

There has been some criticism in Washington over the slow pace of Ukraine’s summer counteroffensive. On Monday Zelenskiy told EU foreign ministers that Ukraine’s ability to defeat Russia on the battlefield depended on the support it received from allies. “Our victory directly depends on our cooperation. The more strong and principled steps we take together, the sooner this war will end,” he said.

The Netherlands and Denmark have pledged to supply Kyiv with F-16 jets, a move that would make it easier for Ukraine’s land forces to advance. Ukraine is hoping for further commitments including Taurus long-range cruise missiles from Germany, and ATACMS missiles from the US – promised but not yet delivered.

On Monday Borrell dismissed the idea – floated by Roberta Metsola, the president of the European parliament, and academics recently – that Kyiv might join in stages, with access to the single market first, followed by political integration. “Membership is membership,” Borrell said. There could be no talk of half, or 25% membership, he said, adding: “[It’s] the strongest security commitment we can give to Ukraine.”

Visiting Kyiv, Germany’s foreign minister, Annalena Baerbock, described Ukraine as the “beating heart of Europe”. In a tweet, she suggested the eastern city of Luhansk – occupied by Russia since 2014 – could in future be a part of an expanded EU that stretched from Lisbon to Russia’s border.

In November the EU will publish its first formal report on progress Ukraine has made so far on required reforms. These include strengthening the independence of the judiciary and media, deoligarchisation and greater recognition of minority nationalities.

Brussels has already indicated that Ukraine has met some targets. It now needs to build up a track record; for example, in building up a back catalogue of convictions in the courts.

Zelenskiy said there was no reason to delay. “Ukraine is ready for the membership negotiation to start and we hope that they start this year. The political solution is needed from Europe. This integration step would help show that Europe would never become weaker,” he said.

The summit also endorsed Zelenskiy’s 10-point peace plan. It was the “only game in town”, Borrell said. The plan calls for Ukraine’s 1991 borders to be fully restored and for Russian troops to return home. It has been discussed twice by national security representatives in the past year but not at this level.

Without referring directly to the US bill, Zelenskiy said on Sunday that nothing would weaken his country’s fight against Russia and no one could “shut down” Ukraine’s stability, endurance, strength and courage.

EU enlargement will be top of the agenda at two summits in Spain this week, one of member state prime ministers and a second wider meeting involving leaders of up to 46 European countries including the nine countries in the queue to join the EU such as Moldova and the western Balkan states.

97
 
 

Zelensky calls for cooperation, new sanctions against Russia at EU foreign ministers meeting

by Nate Ostiller and The Kyiv Independent news desk October 2, 2023

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky spoke about the need for a new round of European Union sanctions against Russia during a historic joint meeting of EU foreign ministers in Kyiv on Oct. 2.

"Any pauses in sanctions prolong Russian aggression, and the pause after the 11th sanctions package has dragged on too long already," he said. The previous round of sanctions was approved June 23, and was aimed at countering sanctions circumvention through third-party countries.

Zelensky emphasized that the fact that the meeting was taking place in Ukraine was a vital symbol of European solidarity, and said that a Ukrainian victory was a common cause for Europe as a whole. "Russia has become an anti-European force that terrorizes and tries to undermine all the foundations of a stable and peaceful life in Europe," he added.

Importantly, Zelensky also explicitly noted his gratitude for the level of support that Ukraine has already received from its European allies, saying that "we appreciate the efforts of every country, every leader, every European company."

Amidst the dispute between Poland and Ukraine regarding grain exports, Polish Secretary of State and Head of the International Policy Bureau Marcin Przydacz suggested on July 31 that Kyiv should "start appreciating the role that Poland has played for Ukraine in recent months and years."

Oleh Nikolenko, a spokesperson for the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry, said that "statements about the alleged ingratitude of Ukrainians for Poland's help are false and unacceptable."

In concluding remarks, Zelensky expressed confidence in the ability for Ukraine to defeat Russia, but stressed that "our victory explicitly depends on our cooperation."

98
 
 

If I am right this is the first footage of the converted Ukrainian ground-to-ground S-200 missile. Lately Ukraine has been using these to target both targets inside Russia and occupied Crimea with various success.

99
 
 

GOP senators weigh go-big-or-go-home strategy on Ukraine The GOP confrontation last week over continued aid was a rude awakening for Mitch McConnell and other senators who back Ukraine funding.

By BURGESS EVERETT and URSULA PERANO

10/02/2023 05:00 AM EDT

From Mitch McConnell on down, the Senate’s pro-Ukraine coalition is trying to reassure the U.S. ally that help will soon be on the way — even after a bruising GOP confrontation over keeping the government open snuffed out billions in immediate new aid.

But for that bipartisan group — which has served as a bulwark against growing House Republican opposition to continued aid — the past week has been a rude awakening. Not until now has the depth of division and tricky politics within the Republican Party been so apparent. And Senate leaders are now doing damage control after the omission of Ukraine aid and plotting to ensure a continued stream of military aid to Ukraine.

The next three months are critical, according to interviews with more than a dozen lawmakers and aides in both parties, and Republicans are signaling that the best shot at delivering Ukraine the weapons it needs will require a single funding bill that can last through the 2024 election, avoiding a series of protracted battles that could sap momentum.

“It’s obvious that there’s some fatigue. And so my own view is we need to do it one time,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas). “We don’t want to do this again every three months. Obviously, that’s open for discussion. But I’m for one and done.”

Democrats’ anger over the episode over the past few days is palpable. Mild-mannered Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado was so upset by the lack of Ukraine funding that he delayed action on the bill until late Saturday night. The majority party is now recalibrating how to move forward.

“We need a little time to go back to the drawing board,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said late Saturday. “A lot of us were caught off guard by how the last 24 hours went.”

In the House Republican Conference, even some of Ukraine’s once-strongest allies have revolted against more cash. Many Republican senators are still on board with helping the country, but they turned against their own bill on Saturday in support of a Ukraine-free House funding bill to avoid a shutdown.

Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump, a Ukraine aid skeptic, is marching toward the party’s presidential nomination.

“There’s going to have to be a major debate in this country,” added Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), the No. 3 Senate leader and one of the many Republicans who retreated from insisting on Ukraine funding when the alternative was a potential shutdown. It was an argument many made privately over the past week — but not McConnell.

At first it looked as though Congress might shelve the debate over Ukraine and disaster money until later in the fall. In fact, that was the initial plan as Democratic and Republican senators devised their government funding legislation. The Biden administration had other ideas.

McConnell, the chief GOP proponent of defending Ukraine against Russia, spoke to both national security adviser Jake Sullivan and Secretary of State Antony Blinken in the days before the Sept. 30 shutdown deadline, according to people familiar with the conversations in Congress and the Biden administration.

McConnell informed the administration that its three-month, $24 billion Ukraine request could never ride on a short-term stopgap bill, and argued for the legislation to instead provide flexibility and transfer authority — flexibility to move around existing money and resources — to buy time; he did not want a shutdown over Ukraine aid.

On Sept. 24, Blinken told McConnell that Ukraine needed money; McConnell ultimately agreed to support the request.

Two days later, the bill came out with $6 billion for Ukraine and was dismissed out of hand by the House GOP. Then, on Friday, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) told House Speaker Kevin McCarthy that Senate Republicans could get behind a funding bill that was silent on Ukraine but included billions in disaster relief, according to a person familiar with the conversations. McCarthy introduced it a day later; only nine Senate Republicans ended up opposing that bill.

“Republicans listened and coordinated our efforts with the House,” said Scott, who regularly hosts conservatives in both chambers at his Capitol Hill townhouse.

Still, McConnell kept advocating for the Senate’s bill and its Ukraine funding up until Saturday’s party lunch, when it became clear the rest of the party simply wanted to avoid a shutdown. That sets the stage for a Ukraine fight later this year, possibly around the new Nov. 17 funding deadline or perhaps the end of the calendar year if Congress punts again.

McConnell insists his party will stick with it regardless of the political pain, declaring he’s “confident the Senate will pass further urgent assistance to Ukraine later this year.” And there’s an argument that McConnell was just sticking to his word to the White House over the past week.

Yet some took the snub of Ukraine aid in the new funding law as a sign of things to come.

“Senate leadership tried to get Ukraine jammed into the CR and they just got bucked. McConnell negotiated it in the CR. And he couldn’t carry the caucus,” said Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who opposes more Ukraine funding. “That’s a big deal.”

Senate Democrats are trying to jump-start a standalone Ukraine funding bill this month in the aftermath of the failed effort to send $6 billion to Ukraine. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) said she believes there is bipartisan support for such a bill, though the timing and structure of the bill is “part of what all needs to be worked out.”

At some point Ukraine backers will have to decide whether attaching money to a must-pass spending bill is the best strategy given the pressures on McCarthy to keep his speakership. Ukraine funding opponent Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said any Senate action only “puts more pressure on [McCarthy] and makes his job harder.”

Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs panel who attended a private meeting McCarthy arranged with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in September, said that he “was present when [McCarthy] told Zelenskyy that he’d be fighting for him to get the money.” Another Democrat in the room, who was granted anonymity, also said that McCarthy committed aid to Zelenskyy, even as publicly he remained noncommittal and suggested he wanted more accountability for any funds.

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) hopes to add his proposal with Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.) for an inspector general to any Ukraine bill to ease concerns over wasteful spending — an idea also popular among some House conservatives. Even then, would the House GOP go along? “There’ll be a big appetite in the Senate — I don’t know about the House,” Kennedy said.

Perhaps an even grander bargain might be necessary. Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), the No. 4 GOP leader, supports an effort to combine the Ukraine debate with a border security bill. The law that funds the government through mid-November is silent on the border despite the Biden administration’s funding request for billions more and a last-minute effort in the Senate GOP to marry border security with Ukraine funding.

Sarah Ferris contributed to this report.

100
 
 

EU foreign policy chief proposes new €5 billion military aid package for Ukraine 02.10.2023, 18:27

The head of European diplomacy, Josep Borrell, has proposed a new bilateral European Peace Facility package of up to €5 billion ($5.26 billion) in military aid to Ukraine next year, the EU official announced at a briefing in Kyiv.

"I hope we can reach an agreement before the end of the year," he said.

According to Borrell, this will be in addition to the funds that EU countries are ready to discuss as part of the broader negotiations on the general budget between now and 2027.

He also announced that in the coming months there are plans to train 40,000 Ukrainians, including fighter pilots.

Borrell also mentioned the desire to strengthen cyber defense and the defense sector of Ukraine.

A meeting of EU foreign ministers took place in Kyiv today. This is the first time such an event is held in Ukraine.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock stated that soon the EU will expand "from Lisbon to Luhansk".

Oksana Zhitnyuk

view more: ‹ prev next ›