This honestly feels like an "everyone sucks here" situation. It's obviously bad that the publisher just sacked the 3 founders of a developer and replaced them with a CEO from a developer they just scuttled... But then there is this terrible sell-out deal the devs went for where 1/3 of the sale price of the company was tied up in sales performance with the deadline rapidly approaching so of course they want to put out a shiny new title for people to buy even though they keep having to cut the planned content down to almost nothing. (supposedly, obvi I haven't played it...)

AND THEN there is what I am calling Schrodinger's Beta. It is supposedly right now ready for early access release (which means Krafton delaying the game is proof of being shady and avoiding the bonus), but also likely going to flop because they got rid of the founders and now they won't have the devs to make it any good (making Krafton correct in delaying the EA because it isn't ready yet...).

This whole thing is a mess of pointing fingers and no one knows what's real. Truth of the matter is probably that both sides are right. Dev's want to push the game out to get the rest of what they feel they are owed, whether the game is ready for EA be damned. Publisher wants to not pay for any of that, downsize the dev team to finish production as cheap as possible just to drop a steaming turd with just enough name recognition to keep their line going up, but not to make enough money they can't plausible deniability sink another developer. I hope I'm wrong, because I was looking forward to Subnautica 2 (mostly just to have a multiplayer subnautica experience), but the industry has mostly convinced me to assume the worst in everyone.