this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
372 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

7708 readers
1938 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Do these people not have cell phones?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 23 hours ago (11 children)

A text would probably wake them up. I wish we had options when sending a text to be in "passive mode" or something. Have it marked as not important and don't notify them. Just have it appear silently waiting on them to check

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I think you do. “Send quietly” is a thing, right?

[–] AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk 18 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

It is not the sender's responsibility to manage the receiver's phone. If the receiver doesn't want to be woken up, then both silent and Do Not Disturb are options.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

The point is so that you could send critical messages that notify them and low priority ones that don't. In this example, they could send a message if something was wrong or they needed help that notifies, or just a "all good" message without a notification. The receiver can't know what will be sent in the future.

[–] Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip 10 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Only problem is Do Not Disturb will silence all your contacts. Now, you might say well just have set so it doesn't silence your important/starred/specified contacts, which is true. But then, you've got it where a started contact is sending you texts at 7 am and you sleep until 10 am, and now you're mad cause they woke you up. Only option is to silence them too, but now you're not hearing their texts/calls until it's scheduled to be off, and if an emergency ever happened you'd feel like shit.

So yeah a "silent send" option would be really nice.

[–] ElectricWaterfall@lemmy.zip 4 points 14 hours ago

Apples do not disturb blocks calls but if a caller calls back twice within 3 minutes I think there’s an option to let that go through for emergency purposes.

[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I"m pretty sure Apple's DND lets you set separate options for calls and notifications.

[–] JordanZ@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

It also lets you specify apps and contacts that can get through. As well as an option for ‘repeat calls’ so if someone tries multiple times it will block them initially but let them through later even if not on any of those lists. You can also customize the Home Screen when in DND or any focus for that matter.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No but sender can request receiver's phone to make silent notification as a metadata. afaik signal or session do not have such feature. idk if some xmpp client support it with say xmpp resource.

[–] AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It is not the sender’s responsibility to manage the receiver’s phone

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

then how say deleted message works? or edited message?

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Is this something too Apple for my Android-pilled mind to understand?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)