this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
363 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

76517 readers
2406 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Are these even legal in Europe (the part that is not the UK...)?

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm no expert, but I believe this is down to the individual member states.

In my country (the NL) it is technically not allowed to film the public street with an automated camera, which effectively makes Ring and equivalents illegal to install in most places

Practically this is not really enforced though, so you see them everywhere anyway.

[–] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

It's indeed not enforced here, but on top of that the police would really like to know that you have cameras filming public space.

Not so they can do something about it, but so they know they can come to you to ask for footage if something happens.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Turn off the motion sensor and only use the push activation, that wouldn’t break the “auto” recording portion. There’s always exemptions, security and law professionals wouldn’t be left without a way to assist themselves.

[–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think yes, as long as it only sees within your private property.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Front yards don’t have the expectation of privacy… that applies to backyards doesn’t it?

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If your front yard is public property, you can't constantly record it, simple.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Front yards aren’t…

And you can’t record a public street for security? Even if it’s deleted? That makes absolutely no sense, how would you ever catch a crime?

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 3 points 1 day ago

Individuals can apply for registration of a fixed camera which must be approved by the privacy agency of the state. If it is approved, you can film into public space, but normally this comes with rules like the anonymization of visible faces and car plates when you are a normal citizen.

Without doing this you are allowed to place a camera for constant monitoring at a fixed place if it films your private property only.

For normal businesses the same rules apply, although you might get a camera approved which watches the area around your entry/exit easier.

Those rules made dashcams illegal in most of the EU, but legislation has caught up in those cases in a few countries - but not all yet.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How do we catch a crime without cameras recording everything all the time? That is your question?

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, I’m asking you. Because you seem to be applying the law to stuff it doesn’t apply to, so I’m trying to figure out your knowledge on it, so we can figure out where you went wrong.

And who said ALL the time, security cameras use motion, or a host of other tech to not record all the time and NOT store it. So which law do you think is being broken?

You are asininely saying that if I took a picture of someone throwing something on my house, that would be inadmissible because the street was in it…? Is that what you think the law is doing here…?

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why wouldn't they be? Is it illegal to record people without their permission in the EU or something? Clueless American here.

[–] troed@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago

Yes, with fix mounted cameras. You can walk around and record with your phone etc though.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You cannot permanently record public places and you may not publish recordings of people (as in them being the main content in the video) without their consent. A temporary recording or live stream should be pretty much a non-issue, especially if you don't do anything with it other than watching it.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

By "permanently record" you mean "keep the footage forever"? Security camera systems usually record on a loop, I doubt this one will be any different. They don't want to manage all that storage anyway.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Permanent as in "not just for a few seconds when someone rings the bell".