this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
253 points (87.3% liked)
science
22303 readers
372 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Eh, if the simulation were allowed to develop organically from the beginning, then it makes sense to me. If it has the fidelity for the subatomic particles comprising your eye then it has the fidelity for macroscopic particles getting in your eye.
I see dust in my eye as a better argument against the existence of a benevolent creator deity, personally.
Sure, either of those arguments. Both of them are incorrect. Not a simulation, no god. We just are.