this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
319 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck AI

4541 readers
1461 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was spell checking myself and the auto-generated summary of results told me that the phrase didn't exist.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

For sure. I was muzzy from waking up and wasn't sure if it was 'in force', en-force, or en force. Pretty sure it is French en force which probably translates directly to in force, but I can't seem to coerce Google search to acknowledge that the phrase exists outside of a band name. If I put it on quotes, the auto summary seems to pick up on it, but still no results. In fact, search seems to be ignoring the quotes completely.

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Google search has been ignoring quotes and verbatim for several years. It also seems to try to interpret what you typed, then search for that interpretation. If you want something that's slightly obscure, but similar sounding to something popular, you have no chance of ever finding it with Google. I've had to switch search engines to start finding things again.

15+ years ago I used to be able to find anything I wanted using Google search with 3 or fewer words. I miss those days.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ask us how they screwed up the AND operator.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The AND operator sucked anyway.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nay nay - the and (+) operator worked perfectly for searching for [search term] and only showing results that included [AND other search term].

If it didn't have the other search term it wouldn't appear. Brilliant.

Until . . .

*scary music*

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

sorry perhaps I misunderstood… I’m thinking of older systems which actually used the AND keyword, as opposed to Google which used + to mean “this word must appear in the search results”.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Back in the day, you could also type 'AND' and Google would interpret it the same as it later did the plus symbol.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Indeed… AND it sucked!

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you maybe thinking of "en masse" instead? I've seen "in force" in English but I can't find the phrase "en force" in any English dictionary, and the wiktionary page only lists it under French.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/en_masse

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/en_force

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago

Maybe I was, but I feel like I have seen it before.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

You were Muzzy?

Muzzy, an old cartoon from Europe.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd recommend Wiktionary.

I've a Kagi bang set up specifically for Wiktionary.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago

I love Wiktionary, but get lazy and will just plop a word into search.

[–] GandalftheBlack@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

CTRL+W opens a new Wiktionary tab on my laptop