this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
1099 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

76798 readers
3071 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
1099
Breaking: Google is easing up on Android's new sideloading restrictions! (www.androidauthority.com)
submitted 1 day ago by popcar2@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
196 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Google: "Based on this feedback and our ongoing conversations with the community, we are building a new advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn't verified. We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren't tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer. It will also include clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved, but ultimately, it puts the choice in their hands."

Thank god. I would've ditched Android for good if this went through, and while it sounds like it would be annoying for casual users to enable unverified apps, at least we can still install them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm curious: I'm currently evaluating mobile Linux OSes to transition away from Android. What I got going right now is Ubuntu Touch on a Fairphone 5, but there's one big drawback with this one for me: the lack of a decent native Signal client.

I've always planned to give Sailfish OS a spin, and I'm almost certain I can install it on the FP5 easily. But I'm not all that keen on ruining my Ubuntu Touch install, and possibly not being able to reinstall it if I want to go back.

So before I install Sailfish OS on it, can you tell me if it has a decent Signal client? If it doesn't, then maybe it's not really worth investigating in the first place for me.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I meant have you tried it? Do you know if it's any good?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yes and yes, but I have no need for it.
I prefer to use Signal's Android version by way of SailfishOS' App support.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 12 hours ago

Ah right okay.

The Android version of Signal works well in Waydroid in Ubuntu Touch also, bu running it permanently in the background like Signal is designed to do is problematic for several reasons that make it kind of a painful proposition. But if I needed it just to send or receive a message punctually, it would be a great solution.

Okay then, it sounds like Whisperfish might work well enough as a primary Signal client to make SailfishOS worth giving a spin. Thanks!