this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
194 points (90.1% liked)

Games

40726 readers
848 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BURN@lemmy.world 84 points 2 years ago (3 children)

There’s no chance GabeN sells Steam. It prints money and only looks to increase their profitability over the coming years.

Microsoft can’t buy them anyways at this point I think. The regulatory bodies didn’t like ActiBlizzard, and this would be similar scale, if not larger

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 39 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I do worry about what might happen when he gets too old/decides to step down though.

If Microsoft did somehow end up buying them I might have to just nope out of gaming altogether. Or just take to the high seas I guess.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I have to imagine he has something planned (inb4 GabeN AI Overlord) for after he’s gone.

He’s a bit crazy about prepping for disaster iirc. He lives in New Zealand now and has since the Covid outbreak. I’d be surprised if there wasn’t a very long document that lays out a lot of rules for if he’s gone and Steam is to continue

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do we get a free copy of the new Gaben AI wiafu?

[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In the immortal words of Cave Johnson:

Brain mapping, artificial inteligence - we should've been working on it thirty years ago

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Holy shit, what if Cave was based on Gabe

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Pretty sure he's back living in the US, so he can actually work at the valve offices

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

At that point I'll probably too old and have lost interest in gaming anyway, so I'll just let the next generation of gamers figure it out themselves. Kinda like boomers leaving us to deal with high property price problem because it's no longer their concern anymore.

[–] master5o1@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 years ago

Nah it's still their concern too. They're mostly just on the beneficial side of it.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone -1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

You do know that stores other than Steam exist, right?

And no, I'm not talking about the EGS.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nothing else comes close to steam in terms of market share.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 0 points 2 years ago

Isn't that a bad thing?

[–] brawleryukon@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

EGS is really the only thing remotely close to what Steam does, though.

GOG will always be an afterthought as long as they have their DRM-free policy in place. They're super cool, but they're a niche and will never grow beyond that without losing what makes them cool.

Origin (or whatever EA's calling their store now) gave up pursuing third-party sales years ago. They still do it, but they clearly have no interest in actually making a go of becoming an actual competitor to Steam.

The Windows Store is terrible for a number of different reasons, even if it's better than Microsoft's previous attempts at getting into this space (coughGWFLcough). EGS is more likely to overtake Steam than Windows Store is to even rival EGS.

Uplay (or, again, whatever Ubisoft is calling their store these days) is like Origin - I don't even know for sure if Ubi is doing third-party sales, but if so, it's very much an afterthought for them.

And then everyone else just sells Steam keys. They're not in the same market as the others, so don't really fit into this conversation. If you're 100% reliant on the store you're "competing" with, you're not competing with them.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 1 points 2 years ago

A lot of games on Steam are DRM-free, but not (yet) on GOG. GOG isn't an afterthought just because of their DRM-free policy, it's also because they're so small.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

GOG is missing a good portion of major games. Outside of that most of the options are much worse

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also they seem really averse to Linux for some reason.

[–] brawleryukon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Probably the miniscule market share coupled with the increased vocality of its userbase.

Supporting Linux will not bring them a significant uptick in revenue but will increase their customer support load.

[–] paholg@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

What else lets me easily play games on Linux, on my couch, without touching a keyboard or mouse?

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah but just the amount of games I own on Steam already (not to mention the Steam Deck), if all that ended up getting enshittified by Microsoft it'd be like having to start over from scratch pretty much.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Which is why I buy as many games as I can from stores like GOG, that actually let me keep them no matter what.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Amazon kinda exists?

[–] Neato@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The regulatory bodies didn’t like ActiBlizzard,

But they did allow it, unfortunately. And MS could simply argue that it already has dominance in the PC space as 96% of PC gamers are Windows users. So owning Steam is just buying 1 out of many stores (here they tout Epic, Amazon, etc).
I mean it's a bad argument but MS made a lot of bad arguments to get their way and they seemingly worked.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Activision-Blizzard-King isn't a dominant company in any segment. You can't say the same for steam. Regulators would have a much easier time blocking such an acquisition.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Plus, at least from my perspective, Activision-Blizzard was already bad enough that if MS made it worse, it wouldn't affect me because they were already bad enough that I'd swore off their games. MS owning them was an improvement or at worst more of the same.

That's absolutely not the case for Valve. They are one of the few large companies that I respect plus they are playing a big role in breaking the windows stranglehold over OSes when you like to play games.

The level of popular opposition to MS acquiring Valve would be on a whole other level than the opposition to the blizzard acquisition. It might even rival the opposition to Nvidia acquiring ARM.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

CoD is dominant fps. It's why they made the concession about it

[–] echo64@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The regulatory bodies hand waved actiblizzard through. Let's not pretend anything else happened there. Microsoft can do whatever they want and no one is gonna stop them. Same as every other big company.

The only thing stopping Ms. is that valve is a privately owned company. But everyone has a price.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The same regulatory bodies that sued to block the deal without any convincing case "handwaved" it?

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, that is just how the American system works. The actual body here is the doj. The ftc tried to sue and was slapped back immediately. This was the ftc trying to show claws and the actual ruling body saying no, you have no power and Microsoft can do what they want.

It was a huge loss for the ftc that has been trying, and failing to fight big tech