this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
306 points (98.7% liked)

politics

26234 readers
2564 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChadCMulligan@lemm.ee 80 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Look, I don’t want to insult stupid people, but trump is a deeply deeply stupid person, right?

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A reminder on just how stupid he is:

“So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and I think you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test that, too. It sounds interesting. And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs, and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that.”

—Donald Trump

Regarding Donald Trump, Rex Tillerson (who was Trump’s pick for) Secretary of State at the time famously said, “This guy is a fucking moron”.

[–] FrankFrankson@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

After the interview Trump thought he nailed it and did a great job..... so I mean conclude from that what you will.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Dunning-Kruger.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 20 points 1 year ago

If Trump wasn't such an hated asshole, there would rightly be people calling this abuse of a person that clearly has cognitive decline or intellectual disability. They just straight up made him look like such an idiot on stage and camera, and he's not even aware of it. It's like Michael Scott level cringe but for President of the country.

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think he's smart, but he's not as dumb as he plays. His supporters are a different story

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 37 points 1 year ago

he's not as dumb as he plays

I dunno about that. He seems deep in cognitive decline to me.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Hanlon's razor suggests it's just his delusion:

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Idk but he sure is racist af.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. He didn't know what DEI stood for, lol

  2. He straight up not only admitted, but used it as an argument in his favor, that he didn't know that the running mate of his opponent in the last presidential election was Black. He also just recently found out that the Vice President of the country for the last 3.5 years is Black. HE'S RUNNING FOR FUCKING PRESIDENT!! 🤣🤣🤣

There is no possible analogy that I can make up to show how ridiculous this is because it's already at max ridiculousness. Any analogy would make it less ridiculous. There's absolutely no other election or application process in the world or history of humanity that would be more ridiculous because it's an ex-President running against the current Vice President for President.

omg, you can't make this shit up.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Whether or not he knew she was black doesn't even matter. He was trying to say she never identified as black until recently, trying to make it seem like she was pandering to black voters or even lying about being black. It's way more insidious than "not knowing."

[–] mwguy 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biden won 92% of the black vote last time. The question is will this change the minds of the last 8% to vote Harris or the next 8% to flip to Trump.

[–] Nurgus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The polls were showing a substantial swing to Trump in the black vote since last time. Up to around 30%. Hopefully Harris can at least reverse that.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Yeah just watched some commentary on this. Holy shit.

Remember that a month ago this shit was a race to the bottom.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Vox Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

Name: Vox Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vox/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.