this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
167 points (99.4% liked)

politics

24821 readers
2563 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration has delayed and may cancel roughly $140 million in grants to fund fentanyl overdose response efforts, according to four staff members with close knowledge of the process at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The staffers shared detailed information with NPR about the funding disruption and potential cuts on the condition of anonymity, saying they don't have permission to speak publicly about their concerns and feared retribution from the Trump administration if identified.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 64 points 4 days ago

So he declared fentanyl from Canada a National Emergency to give himself an excuse to use emergency powers, and is now trying to stop the government from doing anything to combat the actual harm of fentanyl.

He's so fucking transparent, but most Americans read below the seventh grade level so it doesn't matter.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Which is it Donald, are we Canadians an emergency or is fentanyl not a priority?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's both. This is how fascists operate. And they will laugh at and mock you for your puzzlement.

It's an emergency so he could enact tariffs. But he doesn't want people to get better so that can still point to fentanyl and keep invoking emergency powers.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 4 days ago

Its not a priority to help anyone…

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 days ago

So the flimsy excuse he used to enact global fucking tariffs by blatantly abusing the state of emergency powers... Is even more flimsy now.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I do get a bit of a personal chuckle out of reading this. As I'm reading this, I'm literally in the middle of an argument with a bunch of people in the reddit politics sub who actually support Trump bullying Canada around, saying "Canada needs the US more than the US needs Canada, so of course we should negotiate", the $1.3 billion deal was for "Infrastructure jobs and better border security", and "we're gonna have to pay some tariffs to the US and if we don't Canada's economy will crumble"

Trying to explain to them that negotiating with Trump in good faith is a non-starter was itself a non-starter. I certainly hope that their opinion wasn't the opinion of the people of Canada in general.

[–] tane69@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Lmao when that one idiot hit you with “I think you have me confused with Mark Carney” god damn I hate Redditors so much

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If the fentanyl users die by overdose due to lack of funding to properly respond to the overdoses then the US saves money and reduces the number of fentanyl users. It's all win-win! /s

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

There are so many people who actually think that way.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

China, if you're listening...