When content is low quality, posted to the wrong community (usually intentionally), trolls. Basically anything that I feel shouldn't exist. The content that I believe takes value from people's lives instead of adding it. If I find content that I dislike but believe adds value to other people, well that's what the block/ban features are for.
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
Usually it's a "you're an asshole" button.
Conflicted here...
I hear you, but I don't use it. If I disagree with somebody, I use it if they're disingenuous or rude or disparaging towards other people. Because fuck them.
These days, mostly for reddit mirror bots.
I dunno what people's obsession is with Lululemon, and I really don't care, but that fucking bot alone is like 5% of lemmy/all, these days.
For me it's "this comment shouldn't exist" button. Sometimes it's because it makes the experience of reading worse, regardless of the content of the comment. Sometimes it's because the content is so bad.
But i don't just downvote something if I just disagree with it, it should be bad
Bad faith arguments or inflammatory nonsense. We can disagree and I'll upvote if you're actually speaking in good faith.
Pretty much any form of, "Whataboutism" gets downvoted. No one was talking about C, why are you acting indignant about C when people were discussing A and B, you know?
I disagree, so I downvoted you. Guess that's my answer.
It's not a "disagree" button, but it is a "you're wrong" button. They could be wrong by trolling, spreading misinformation, spamming, being disingenuous, refusing to understand the topic or engage in good faith... None of those contribute to the conversation.
I downvote anything that I deem worsens the quality of the community. This includes, but is not limited to:
-
misinformation
-
trolls
-
bad faith engagement
-
uncalled for hostility and incivility
-
very lazy, low effort posts/comments
Whatever I want.
I have no obligation to downvote consistently.
I do what I want!
"Disagree"/"its bad"/"eww"
To order a delicious sorbet.
"This"
Not your post, but anything that's just an upvote in the form of a comment.
Also anything that's egregious misinformation or bad faith posting.
Or anything that's just spammy or bonkers crazy. I've blocked more people in my 1-ish year on Lemmy than I had in something like 10 years on Reddit...it definitely feels like Lemmy is the haven for Reddit refugees, including those who got banned for not really understanding how to engage in this type of space.
Also, any post that really doesn't fit the community. Like NoStupidQuestions posts that aren't questions or are really just AITA or DAE (social validation) posts in disguise.
I know that sounds like a lot, but for the most part, I don't vote on things. I upvote most posts that are cool/interesting enough to get me to go to the source or read through the comments, as well as any good comments. And pretty much any comment that engages in discussion with my own comments without being annoying or rude, lol
Silly OP, I don't even have a downvote button (idk if it's the instance I'm in but I don't particularly mind ngl)
I mostly downvote bad faith, hostile or just generally angry/mean comments independent of whether I agree with them or not. Basically I'm using it against the people that are polluting the air here.
To add a little colour to my front page.
It's a disagree button. That's how it's used in practice, and we're better off just accepting that.
What does that say about the sorting algorithms though? Should we sort posts based on votes then, or should we sort them based on something else? Do we want the posts at the top to be the ones the hivemind agrees most with and the ones the hivemind disagrees with should disappear at the bottom?
Perhaps sorting should be based on total votes and not just downvotes? So downvoting is effectively still "voting" for it, just in a different way. I'm just spitballing here, I find the theory of sort/vote systems fascinating.
This is a really nice situation where you can confidently say anyone downvoting you is a hypocrite.
I don't have a downvote button but if I did I'd use it on misinformation. Things that are factually incorrect or unsubstantiated.
As the electronic version of [look of disapproval], the same way the upvote means [nodding while thinking yes yes]
I use it for
- Not relevant
- Needs editing for writing mistakes.
Is incorrect or does not contribute to the topic of the thread
I like to reserve it for special occasions. Comments that are very confidently wrong, needlessly edgy or rhethorically loaded. Anything that I don't want to dignify with a verbal response but where I still want to express my aversion. The exception are "funny downvotes" like mass downvoting the fourth person in a chain or stuff like that.
misinformation and acting in bad faith, both of which have a funny habit of occuring at the same time
All of these comments are like "down votes aren't dislikes, heres how i use them: list of things they dislike"
Disagree.
Racism and homo/transphobia, which are often disguised as (mis)information. I don't usually downvote people unless they're being outright hateful though and then sometimes I block them too.
Also downvote & report spam, which is actually pretty rare on lemmy.
For content that lowers the quality of the fediverse. Misinformation, reposts, bad faith actors, etc.
Unhelpful / unconstructive
"I don't like this" button.
Which is often something I disagree with
Bad faith, low effort, hostility.
"This does not contribute" button.
On a related topic, one thing I learned from the old Century Club days on reddit is the Courtesy Upvote.
If a thread is interesting enough that you commented, upvote it, upvote all the other comments.
If someone replies to you or one of your posts, upvote them too.
misinformation, slurs, incivility, off-topic content, and video links without text summaries