this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
369 points (98.4% liked)

News

31057 readers
3074 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But Trump is the anointed one who will expose all the adrenochrone-swilling pedophile democrats.

Right?

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago

Yes. Spot on. Exactly. Correct.

...
Or maybe, just maybeeeee, he's the one involved in a paedo trafficking ring and he is covering his tracks?
His actions pretty much explain which is the easiest to believe. So judge him on his actions...

[–] lostoncalantha@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Are you still talking about Epstein? /s

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

It's almost like they dont want to oppose it.

Republicans: The pro-life pro sex trafficking "conservative" party.

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 106 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Makes sense if your country is being run by child rapists.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 day ago

Call your legislators office asking about this and Epstein while pretending to be conservative

[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

The pedophile party making life easier for pedophiles once again.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The thing here though to note is, they're not legalizing human trafficking, they're just massively weakening it so they can't investigate people making a lot of money on it.

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

And yet, with the massive surveillance initiatives they have right now with companies like Meta, Pallentier, and the Miliatry they will be more equipped than ever to catch them. I guess only fall guys and outsiders will get caught.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

De facto decriminalization. Coming to a trafficker near you (like, really near you - probably in a hotel within 5 minutes of your house)

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tbh, it's been that way ever since I've lived here. Dboyz hook them in, they can't pay the bills. One told me he was a "bodyguard." I guess if you look at it a certain way, they guard bodies they "own." This is a minimum wage, "right to work” state.

Im not sure what other way this headline could be interpreted.

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

"LOOKS LIKE MEATS BACK ON THE MENU BOYS" -- some rich tech-bro probably

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I could have sworn that "human trafficking" was the cudgel that conservatives were using to justify their ban on porn.

Or is this a situation where they get rid of the department so that the administration alone can define what human trafficking is?

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

And it battles illegal immigration. You'd think they want to stop that, too???

Oh wait, that kind of trafficking hurts brown people so it can stay.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Epstein who?

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Our government is being run by pedos.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 day ago

Always has been.

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 5 points 1 day ago

Of course they do

[–] henfredemars 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean that would be against the interest of Epstein and his buddies.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 day ago

Buddies = governments, mega corporations, ultrarich

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

I do find this a bit odd, though. Because there's no better way to do whatever you want than to piggyback it on a "save the children" narrative. Seems like these departments could have played a key role in their authoritarian overreach strategies.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago

More evidence that someone is spinning up a new business with a certain client list that "doesn't exist".

[–] abcdqfr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where is the convicted human traffickers, Tate brothers? Why are they there? Who is responsible? What hot topic are they caught in??
in a game of a thousand cuts, when do we slash back??

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yup you covered all the W’s.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

For a second I misread the punctuation, IE I thought it meant "to combat human trafficking, the state department guts it's office".