this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
79 points (92.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42345 readers
1036 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's just rhythms and pitches really, in a sequence. But we don't love patterns, a scale sounds boring. It's the breaking of the patterns that sound good in music, but only in specific ways. Other ways sound discordant. What the duck is going on?

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Neuromancer49@midwest.social 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

PhD in neuroscience here. I didn't specifically study musicology, but i did study the neuroscience of music.

The theory that holds the most water, in my opinion, is that music activates all the same parts of the brain as motor processing. It makes us want to move, and to make predictions about what's coming next. People like makimg predictions. It's also a pro-social activity that encourages bonding and communication. These are typically positive experiences.

Edit: you mentioned we like the breaking of patterns in music. Very true, we love syncopation. But we don't tap our foot to the rhythm, we groove to the beat.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes I am a human, I love human things like... um... music...

finishes zipping up skinsuit

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Because at it's core, music is a beautiful lack of auditory dissonance. See this minutephysics episode for an in depth explanation why. It's fundamental. (to music itself, not to any particular style of music) https://youtu.be/tCsl6ZcY9ag

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

i can only think of one style of music that doesn't heavily rely on dissonance.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 18 hours ago

Don't animals also "understand" music to some extent and seem to enjoy it?

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

But we don't love patterns

I would disagree with that somewhat - I think we do love patterns, but the more complex and intricate the better.

Which is why music appeals so much - it's chock full of patterns overlaying each other, echoing and counterpointing each other, contrasting each other in ways that are both conflicting and harmonious. Good music is like seeing the rhythms of the world all around you.

[–] mrbeano@lemmy.zip 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yes! When a chorus repeats and becomes familiar, or when a sequence resolves and the pattern is "recognized". Satisfying to the core.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Exactly - chills up the spine moments!

By the way your link didn't work, but this one might: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resolution_%28music%29?wprov=sfla1

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

"Is it not strange that sheep's guts should hail souls from mens' bodies?" -- Shakespeare, Much Ado About Nothing

(Guitar/lute strings used to be made from sheep gut, for anyone confused)

[–] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm also interested in why there is such varying tastes in music. Why do I love metal but hate pop? shrugs

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (6 children)

And why do I love both metal and bluegrass, and find them similar?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 11 points 1 day ago

While I enjoy a lot of metal and not any bluegrass that I've heard, I do sorta get that one. They do share quite a bit in terms of their rhythmic feel, both (depending on your metal subgenre) doing a lot of rapid-fire staccato notes to keep up a really fast pace, and also share some of their roots in Black American music. The timbres of the instruments used the choices of notes are very different of course, but I don't think that you're inventing a non-existent similarity

[–] toomanypancakes@piefed.world 11 points 1 day ago

Play bluegrass an octave down and distorted, hit the drums more, and you're basically at metal

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Hey, fuck that song! Listen to Harvester of Constant Sorrow for an on-the-nose Thrash Grass mashup!

Then unfuck that song and listen to it again, and then this one again. And then listen to Leo, and then UMC, and finally fuck your own ears with the dulcet duality of Bardcore.

The only thing I love more than an artist creating their own song is another artist lovingly reinterpreting it.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Oh my friend!

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=iron+horse+bluegrass+metallica

I just put Metallica to give you a taste, MUCH more!

[–] vagabond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same! I really hope I get to be the first one to show you this 🤘

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARgbT9VwKCI

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Love it! 🤘🤘

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably based on where you were born and raised:

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

NOOOOOOOOOOO, GODDD NOOOOOOOOOOO

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And here I am, I don't really like pop and I don't really like metal but put them together and I'm in heaven.

[–] RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 2 points 23 hours ago

Knew what it was before even clicking

GIMME CHOCOLATE

[–] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago

How did I know it was going to be Babymetal? 😛

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 13 points 1 day ago

I'm not a scientist, but I think it is because humans like patterns, which is what music is. What makes random banging and loud noises annoying and how is that different from music? I think the answer is that music has patterns. What makes people like or hate different types of music is that they like one pattern over another.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't. And I don't understand why I'm the only one who just in general would rather hear silence then music.

[–] MarieMarion@literature.cafe 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'm the same. I don't listen to music, ever. It does nothing for me (except hurting my ears if it's medium or high volume, annoying me, stressing me out if it's fast, and preventing me from understanding spoken words.). There's something weird in my brain, I think.

[–] buffing_lecturer@leminal.space 2 points 13 hours ago

There is a gremlin in your brain, textbook synonym here.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

I've met 2 people like that, you're not alone! I love music but y'all are valid

[–] jago@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

I too like silence, then music, when the album I'm listening to intended to have a break between songs.

However, if the songs' tracks are meant to fade from one to the next without a break, it's annoying and distracting if I can hear a silence between them, however small -- even just a click -- then music.

[–] hisao@ani.social 8 points 1 day ago

It’s the breaking of the patterns that sound good in music, but only in specific ways. Other ways sound discordant.

I like a lot of different music and I also like harsh noise, when it's adventurous like Merzbow. It sounds discordant, but it sounds great and I enjoy listening to it. Maybe you should go more fundamental, "why do we humans like information entropy" or something like that.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

The answer is we don't know unfortunately. I dont think scientists have found a definitive answer on this one. The theory tho is that it had some evolutionary benefit in the past, but we dont know why that would be either.

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Why do we like reading? It's just arbitrary characters, really, in a sequence.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

This discounts so many quantitative and absolute qualities of music.

[–] kelpie_returns@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Cause it makes me feel funny and I like it duh

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think all experience of art, enjoyable for us or not, is something the brain adheres to because it is unlike nature. Nature tries to all blend together in a very loose way. We categorize many things like animals, land, the stars… but it all is really just one thing. Art is the ability to purposefully change that continuity with intent. To see something sitting there, doing nothing, and you feel the desire to arrange it in some way.

Music is no different. We realized sound was one of our senses and most of nature’s songs are chaotic, outside the rare particularly talented bird.

We’ve found ways to harness sound into whatever we found is most pleasing. And it seems what it pleasing is different from one person to the next, but also shares ground through the instruments we use.

I imagine when we first started rhythmically hitting sticks on rocks, it wasn’t long before we had an arrangement of our favorite sticks and rocks to hit together. And we just kept getting more creative from there.

[–] hisao@ani.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay, but why do we love art of nature then? If you go further, some people love hyper-realistic art of nature, while others prefer surrealistic or abstractionist/minimalist stylized art of nature. If we talk about scale between absolute chaos and absolute order, art covers it all.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think when we capture nature in a hyper-realistic way, the takeaway is control. We get to choose exactly what is included and what is not. It’s also about admiring the process that goes into it. We’re able to comprehend the work that went into making that possible. It also means that you get to stop time in the piece. You’re seeing that very specific part of reality that artist wanted you to see.

[–] hisao@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I agree those are some of possible motivations, but I also think there are countless other motivations for it in the wild. The "We get to choose exactly what is included and what is not" thing I personally think is more a "minimalism" mindset than realism, but that's just my perspective. A lot of people who do realism, just go there and draw exactly what they see, or they have people pose for them. They ofc choose the scene and pose, but they don't deliberately strip detail for artistic value like minimalists do, which means minimalists push way heavier into this "control what's included and what not" territory.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] jago@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Please provide a synopsis of what the link presents. When you throw up a youtube link, we don't know what we're getting until we get it.