Once again, I'll believe it when I see it.
I've long since lost any hope of real consequences.
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
455 points (96.9% liked)
politics
24812 readers
1843 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yes. Furthermore it seems if you’ve ever held office, been a director, worn a uniform or robe your invincible. Unless you did the right thing. I’m sure you get punished for having integrity.
You can thank a single, unnamed, person in 1874 for that. Congress passed section 1983 of the Federal Code in 1871. They included a 16 word clause that the person entrusted to copy the Congressional Record into the Federal Register illegally omitted. This clause became the focal point of Harlow V Fitzgerald in 1982. Because the 1982 SCOTUS didn't bother checking the Congressional Record, because why would they, the entire argument that allowed Qualified Immunity revolves around the missing clause. Had they had they original text, they wouldn't have ruled the way they did.
Got more details on this missing clause? I'd like to learn more.
The consequences haven't been fully enforced yet, but I'm cautiously optimistic about this one. He's already been found guilty of fraud and there's already an order from the judge to dissolve Trump Org and all presence in NY - hotels, golf courses, businesses, etc. The rest of the trial is just "how much of an additional fine does Trump need to pay?"
Of course, there will be appeals and it's possible the verdict gets overturned. Still, it's a promising direction.
"fold like a stack of cards" 🤔
If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes should fall like a house of cards.
Checkmate
King me.
Go fish.
Bingo
Yatzhee!
I lost the game
I.e., collapse in the most satisfying way possible?
"If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes should fall like a house of cards. Checkmate." -Zapp Brannigan
Imagine having a deck of cards. Now try to fold them. Slow and difficult right?
That's the analogy.
Stack of cards ^^
Deck of cards ^^
.. Since we're being pedantic, the first is a house of cards. A stack of cards can be a deck but a deck is only when it has a complete set of 52 cards. You also don't 'fold' a house of cards, it 'falls' or 'comes down' to denote it's instability. 'folding' is either literally as in creasing the center and making two ends meet or metaphorically as in poker where you just.. Put them aside.
Since you can't fold a house of cards and the other meaning wouldn't make sense, the only possible take away from this sentence is literally folding a stack (but not a deck) of cards. I don't know why you made me do this.
The rich never get convicted.
That is why the civil trial to take away his riches is going first before all his criminal trials.
Can a stack of cards get so tall that the bit at the top escapes Earth's gravity?
Or does it just take like... most of a decade to fall?
The left needs to stop believing that THIS TIME the MAGA followers will see the fraud. It will never happen. There is no house of flares related to his reputation. There is him (the victim truth teller) and the angry left who break laws to bring him down.
Their handlers could tell them the sky is green and grass is blue and the next day there'd be dozens of blossoming new conspiracy theories about "big Crayola" and the leftist elites' woke control over colors and child molestation/adrenal harvesting.
Kid Rock will paint his lawn blue to own the libs
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
Maybe 1984 was an instruction manual.
The effects of gravity drop at the distance squared. I believe it technically is felt up to the very edge of the universe (if there is one) or infinity. At a more reasonable scale, it would only be if the card got close enough to fall into another bodies gravity well than the Earth's that it wouldn't fall back to earth. That'd be a house of cards somewhere around 300k-350k km high to get pulled onto the moon.
Cheers. I am very rusty on most of that stuff.
The children's book "the emperor's new clothes" is so unrealistic who would ever buy into that kind of delusional thinking?
Meanwhile all the people that have been suckered by this guy despite all the evidence that he is just a con man...
That book was banned due to nudity.
former prosecuter
As opposed to the current prosecutor. If the current prosecutor commented publicly in such a manner, it would be highly unprofessional. Rather like Trump publicly bashing the judge presiding over his trial...
Exactly, which makes the comments perfectly apropos.
Salon is the liberal version of Brietbart; never trust any analysis that they have.
Eh ... We'll see.
Feels like what they told Reagon in the first CIA briefing...,"The Soviet Union will fall like a deck of cards, because it is a deck of cards."
Granted, it did fall. All it took was for the US and USSR to race each other towards bankruptcy and for the USSR to win.
Since the USSR no longer exists, i wonder how they won.
They "won" by going bankrupt first. The reward was the collapse of their system of government. Had the US "won" that race and gone bankrupt instead, we might have seen the nations of New York, California, Texas, etc break off from the US.
It was a little more complex than that. The USSR didn't have an industrial base that it needed, so it took from its satellite countries. Like a house of cards, when economic pressure was put on the top, it was felt on those countries below and they began to revolt. For the US, which had an industrial base, the 30B dollars spent on SDI fantasy was absorbed through debt. There was really no chance of the US going bankrupt.
Real justice works slowly. I hope this is it.
I hate that though. Like, yes I want justice to be thorough, but working slowly has not seemingly worked well enough for this country. Too much time to do damage.
Checkmate.
A blue tie?!? WTF
a TAN SUIT ???
It's goin' down, I'm yellin' timber
So like, if I was a defendant in a civil case, and if I tried a fraction of the bullshit he’s pulled in the context of this particular trial alone, I’d be thrown in jail for contempt of court faster than you can say “hamberder”.
I am waiting for the judge to throw the book at him, but I’m honestly not expecting it.