this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

Hacker News

2904 readers
356 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alaphic@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I still have yet had anyone be able to tell me exactly what value AI brings to the table, other than as customer facing chat bots they can use while firing their actual CS departments

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe -1 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

That’s ridiculous. It’s possible to recognize the technology has many good uses, but complain how it has been hyped too much.

For example: AI-driven materials discovery uses machine learning to analyze chemicals and materials, allowing scientists to find and design new compounds much faster than humans could through traditional trial and error.

[–] FrogmanL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I agree with you. There is a knee-jerk “AI bad” when the real answer is it’s overhyped. There are good uses for it. I use it nearly daily for work, and, like anything other tech, it’s just a tool. It doesn’t replace me. It just makes me faster. Anyone that claims it can replace people might as well say that a hammer can replace a person.

[–] greygore@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Machine learning is not why companies are dumping hundreds of billions of dollars into building data centers so they can earn tens of billions of dollars; it’s specifically large language models. Machine learning existed before the LLM boom and had real benefits, but has barely seen a fraction of the investment into it that LLMs have, because it didn’t have a bunch of tech bros speculating that artificial superintelligence would make them trillionaires.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe -2 points 13 hours ago

That is one particular side of the conversation

[–] Laser@feddit.org 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The current hype and the massive investments are about generative AI, not the actually-useful-for-humanity applications.

Image recognition, medical research etc. are not drives the current market. It's about offering a service that the broad masses use continuously. Otherwise these investments don't make sense.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe -1 points 18 hours ago

But I guess all they could think of was Chatbots. It just shows that very few people actually know what AI is doing beyond what they see in the news. I’m not thrilled how the rollout is going of course, but I recognize that there are good aspects

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago