this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
150 points (94.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

35510 readers
1149 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trying to argue with conservatives.

All that they're great at is detouring, distancing, playing down, doubling-tripling down, disassociating, strawmen and more illogical fallacies. They can't take up an honest debate unless there are rules in place that gives them any outs from being pressed when confronted with questions they can't give truthful answers to.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Presenting facts to conservatives.

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Talking with .ml users, turns out you really can't fix stupid

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

their brains are so big that anyone who doesn't agree with them about anything ever is a fascist.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

the only good revolutionary a traitor to the revolution

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Figuring out that you can’t change anyone’s mind by arguing online

The only thing you achieve is a dopamine hit for being right

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

i've changed plenty of people's minds online... but truth me told it was like 10 years ago before social media rotted their brains and everyone was living in hug boxes. and it was generally among my peer group of 20/early 30 somethings. it wasn't teenagers or people in their 50s.

i used to be a part of tons of communities on reddit where people actually argued productively. but again, this was a decade ago. world was different, people were different. today people dismiss you based on the slightest disagreement.

hell on this site i have been told i'm a fascist for linking to government data and wikipedia. apparently facts are fascist now.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

All that they’re great at is detouring, distancing, playing down, doubling-tripling down, disassociating, strawmen and more illogical fallacies.

it's all they have, facts have an overwhelming liberal bias; science and research keep making them look like fools for their decisions and lifestyles; they're going to try to repeal the 19th amendment because they're tired of losing the votes from half the population.

never do they try to fix their problems, address the needs of their base, it's always doubling down on hating some portion of the population that must be to blame, see POC, transfolk, the dark scourge of ANTIFA etc

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Arguing with religious people. Especially the ones who ring doorbells

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Living in modern society.

I do everything I'm supposed to, i jump through hoops all day all week all year, making the responsible and correct decisions, and there is almost no reward. The reward is I get to keep doing it instead of getting to do anything else with my life. The reward is that I get to keep supporting this system that barely supports me, this system i was born into and never agreed to depend on for survival.

Such is the life of a slave i guess

[–] Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the boss doesn’t like you for whatever reason you’re done.

Just get out of there, fighting their bullshit never works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

trusting mods of any social media platform to apply rules unilaterally. you'd be better off trusting a bear while being slathered in bacon grease.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

99% of all arguments on the internet. Someone is almost always going to engage in some kind of pedantry, butwhatabout, technicality, argumentative fallacy, etc. to try to make themselves right and/or imply the OP was wrong in some way. They are not open to having their mind changed. Especially when it comes to politics, and there’s essentially no hope for religion at all. This generally applies to IRL discussions, too. At least the internet argument you can just walk away, block, or unsubscribe to any replies to the thread.

In the same vein…expecting anyone to change. People have to change themselves, and it’s not up to you. You can’t make it happen except maybe in the most extreme situations, and even then it might be iffy.

And I hate to say it, apologizing on the internet. Once the downvote train starts and shitting on the offender’s posts there’s almost no way out and any apology isn’t worth the effort. I find this kinda hypocritical seeing as there are numerous internet posts about the value of admitting you don’t know something or might have it wrong, and how we shouldn’t shame people for admitting that, yet if someone screws up and apologizes they’re usually hosed. Just reinforces not apologizing.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

arguing online isn't a liberal arts classroom.

why would you expect people to know what argumentative or logical fallacies are? those are rules setup for academic debate. they don't apply to most arguements outside of the academic setting.

ad hominenems, for example, are totally valid in political/personal conversation. it's totally valid in life for people to dismiss me and my ideas based on what clothes I'm wearing. It's not if we are in the context of a debate club.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Trying an argumentative fallacy yourself? A little red herring or straw manning? Nobody said anything about a classroom.

In no way did I suggest the opponent should know what fallacy they are using or that there are rules for the rabble online, the fallacies are mentioned so that you, the reader, would know what people do in an argument that make it not worthwhile, and that the opponent is using them to avoid conceding anything.

One can also infer that using those techniques, even unknowingly, are still common bullshit arguments by an opponent that isn’t discussing in good faith when presented with objective facts. Again, why it’s a lost cause to argue online.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

You completely miss my point. It's not a fallacy if you don't agree it's a fallacy.

There is no universal set of rules for argumentation. They are agreements of convention that are context dependent.

Like in philosophy we don't accept arguments from authority/precendent. But in law argument from authority/precedent is completely valid. It's almost as if different disciplines have different rules.

But hey, if you want to go try to score points in football by throwing the ball in a basket, and telling everyone else they are fucking idiots for not having a basket on the football pitch.... good luck with that.

it's only a 'fallacy' if all participants agree to the rules that declare it as such.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

and you are just a bad faith actor.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Brutha I didn’t change the subject and argue points my opponent wasn’t trying to make in order to make myself right about something. You are literally an example of what I was talking about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 60 points 2 days ago (31 children)

Really trying to change anyone's mind online. I've just given up trying to debate evil, I just try to make people laugh at them now.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

how do you know you're not the evil one?

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You're very perceptive, clearly I could not deceive you. You play mind games well, so you must be Machiavellian. But Machiavelli hated the cynicism of realpolitik, so a fan of his writing clearly cannot be Machiavellian. So I must be the evil one.

So you've made up your mind?

I'm just getting started! Your username is funny, so you must have a sense of humour. Funny people tend to lean left, because comedy is an act of empathy! But it references frogs, which became right wing iconography last decade so you clearly are not a leftist!

I've decided. I'll drink from my cup. Oh, look what's that!

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

it's not a mind game dude.

the people you think as evil, don't think they are evil. they think they are good and you are evil.

if you get away from the stupid bilary of 'good/evil' you might better understand that life is more about what goals other people want and what they are willing to do to accomplish them.

You think Trump is evil probably, but for those that support him he is doing justice and truth to the world and fighting for good, because it's the leftist/liberal forces that are causing evil.

the funny thing about life is most people think you are good.... until you disagree with them or try to get in the way of their goals. Then you are evil.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Moral relativism detected - luckily I am already being hilarious. You'll never catch me slipping, Satan.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

who is your authority for morality? God?

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 13 hours ago

I never said I'd discuss that with you, stop acting weird. 😐

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

true i've had discourse about communism and israel on here and people are not discussing anything

just stating their beliefs over and over

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Lot of agendaposters online these days. It's the easiest way to do that job I guess

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 39 points 2 days ago

Of course it's a losing battle. Remember what Sartre said:

Never believe that fascists are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The fascists have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

Conservatives around the world for the past ~30 years (if not longer) have been slowly adopting fascist methods and talking points. And for the past ~10 years, conservatives and fascists have formed a Venn diagram of a circle.

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Getting involved in a land war in Asia. Also going in against a Sicilian when death is on the line.

Fallen for those blunders more than once!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Shigeko_Kageyama@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Trying to keep my house clean. I have a three year old and a 2 year old. The only time it's ever truly clean is late at night after they go to bed and I'm exhausted. The minute they get up it's like a tornado goes through here.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Arguing facts with an idiot, an ignorant person

[–] solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I think OP already made that point

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Trying to apply nuance to a discussion that consists of people that only want to polarize the subject.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›