this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
1072 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

76798 readers
3139 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google: "Based on this feedback and our ongoing conversations with the community, we are building a new advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn't verified. We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren't tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer. It will also include clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved, but ultimately, it puts the choice in their hands."

Thank god. I would've ditched Android for good if this went through, and while it sounds like it would be annoying for casual users to enable unverified apps, at least we can still install them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dorumon@lemmy.cafe 23 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

So I just read what they are going to do and this article is just clickbait. Basically they still want you to dox yourself but it'll still work like iOS Test Pilot. Google is still full of shit and lies but hey at least you don't have to pay them money until enough users download your app if you want more.

So it'll basically still kill apps like F-Droid or you downloading an app from the internet to run on your phone. You'll basically have to signup to install third party apps on your device per app in general and alot of the convenience and developer community will still just leave android as a whole.

All in all really bad decision on Google's part while also extending this to things like fireOS or whatever the fuck the Quest 2 and 3 will run as a skin of android. This will make sure they would be forever stuck on older versions of android; lest they have to contend with the new upcoming android features that will enforce this that will be baked into the operating system next year. Even without Google Play Services like I read.

Personally I don't think developers should have to sign up to Google and provide ID cards to basically have a limited amount of users use their specific app outside the app store.

Google obviously is feeling threatened by better apps that more people are using on platforms like F-Droid compared the outright subscription based shitware and adware on the playstore. Which is why they are doing this. But like platforms before like inturn Symbian. I personally think it'll fuck them over so hard that'll they'll never recover while China or whomever else makes a new platform for you to run android apps on for a time before going all proprietary fucked up Linux. Just like Android again.

[–] Integrate777@discuss.online 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

They'll probably also release a new API to allow apps to check if user have enabled sideloading. Then overzealous apps like fucking mcdonalds will throw a hissy fit about it and refuse to work unless you turn it off. Also your bank too, just to really make it as hard as possible to include sideloaded apps. Sideloading will remain available, but so painful, most people just give up.

Just recently mcdonalds app stopped working when installed in a secondary profile. Long history of them trying to detect root hiding methods too. Fuck them. Once this sideload block thing arrives, mcdonalds would be the first to block it.

[–] dorumon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 55 minutes ago

You know it's kinda funny that I can't even run the MC Donalds app without doing some fuckery. But my banking app will throw a hissy fit if I try to sign into my account without a rooted or custom ROMed phone because that's how they know it's me apparently. Also shame that my banking app stopped supporting Android 8.0 a few years back. I miss my LG V20.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Google also extending this to things like fireOS

it would not, because fireos was based on ancient versions of android like android 11 or earlier, and the block is enforced via google play services which isn't present on there.

but new fireos doesn't run android apps at all. New devices temporarily run android apps on a VM hosted on AWS servers and then stream the video, but only if those apps are distributed on the amazon appstore, and it's a stopgap until the devs make their apps compatible with the new OS.

And old fireos devices will start to gradually uninstall "dangerous" sideloaded apks

[–] SnowPenguin@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Good news! But it doesn't change the fact that Google tried to do this in the first place.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 50 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

For now. You just wait. Evil corp is gonna evil corp it all up.

[–] danielton1@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I miss the days when their slogan was "Don't be evil"

[–] SnowPenguin@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, Google used to be the "Cool" company back then. I used to root for them.

[–] RacerX@lemmy.zip 62 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Straight from the playbook. Announce something terrible, then back off with something bad. Everyone calls it a win.

See: Wizards if the Coast, Unity

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 hours ago

And 5 years they'll try it again.

Do terrible thing A to test the sentiment, probe the reaction, backpedal a bit, admit caveats and facilitate pre-planned option B, try again after a few days and gocus on it died down.

At one point we'll need diff monitoring on the TOC and all other legal imprints :|

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 52 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

No freaking way this was because of "feedback". This was because the European Commission will keep escalating their fines if Google keeps at it with the monopoly bullshit.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

The EU is just a bit behind being maliciously lobbied to death (eyeroll).
(See Digital Omnibus Act)

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 11 points 14 hours ago

Quite some time ago, the messaging I was getting from Microsoft was that Windows 10 security updates were going to end this year. I didn't really keep up with the news on that front, but I did notice that there was some kind of law suit in the EU that from what I recall basically came down to the fact that MS would have to continue to provide security updates to Win 10 free of charge for EU users.

Literally within the last week, a buddy of mine asked me to look at his computer and see if I could upgrade it to Win 10. I could not, as it doesn't have a supported processor. But what I noticed is that MS now offers the option to extend security updates until 2026 with the click of a button.

So, thanks EU folks! Already knew ya'll were awesome, but I assume this change of heart from Microsoft was a result of that suit. I appreciate it.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 64 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (8 children)

Google: "Based on this feedback and our ongoing conversations with the community, we are building a new advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn't verified.

And we will NEVER trust you again because we know you'll retry this next year or so in a few smaller steps that all have cutesy innocent names that are supposed to lull us in a false sense of security

Fuck Google, stop paying them for anything, stop using their services wherever possible.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 75 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't consider this a win, guys, this is more of an 'Oh shit, we're screwed if we follow through with this right now' moment, there's nothing stopping them from walking this back at a later, less turbulent date when no one's paying attention, and locking Android down anyways, as this directly reminds me of the situation which caused WEI to be scrapped.

Also, the EU pushing Chat Control through the back door might embolden Google to both try an Android lockdown just like was going to roll out before, and try WEI again, and get both actually pushed through somehow.

I wouldn't even be surprised if MS were emboldened to try to lock down PCs... Again....

[–] PaintedSnail@lemmy.world 24 points 19 hours ago

I mean, sure, but there was never anything stopping them from doing this in the first place except public pressure. Large companies changing tracks due to public demand is a good thing, and definitely a win.

I think its better to simply realize that a win doesn't mean the fight is over. It's okay to be happy about a success. Just don't let up on the pressure.

[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Thank god. I would've ditched Android for good if this went through, and while it sounds like it would be annoying for casual users to enable unverified apps, at least we can still install them.

You would have ditched Android for ios if it were implemented?

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 11 points 13 hours ago

Not hardly. I've been looking for a reason to support Linux phones, and that would just have been the thing to do it.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago

At least the apple ecosystem all works. Androids full of shit that will never be fixed. Looking at Google cast in particular. There have been many others too.

Ive been using Android for more than a decade, fwiw

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jinarched@lemmy.ca 7 points 14 hours ago

Eh, I'm probably gonna ditch that smartphone thing anyways, at least for a while. Android becoming a closed-off garden was the last straw and I was kinda looking forward trying to go without a phone to test if I can adapt. I started leaving the house without my phone more and more and I kinda like it.

Sure, it's fun and convenient to have the Internet in my pocket. Heck, it's even required in some cases, but this digital mess we are currently in is too much for me. I remember how I was looking forward having one back then; I was really looking forward having acces to the Interney wherever I was, but nowadays I kinda miss being less conected from all the bullshit especially when outside.

I guess I could get a linuxphone one day if I miss having a phone (if I somehow manage to completely remove the smartphone from my life in the first place).

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 56 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

Google: “Based on this feedback and our ongoing conversations with the community, we are building a new advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn’t verified.

I've been side loading apks since I bought my first Android phones and am much more concerned about malware "safe" apps from Google's Play store. Google's quality control is shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren’t tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer.

Translation: if they want scamware, it better be from Google Play, where Google gets a 30% cut. On top of the cut they got for the phishing link in Google Ads.

And if anything thinks I'm being hyperbolic, go on Google Play and search for pretty much anything. Or turn off your adblocker.

[–] Buckshot@programming.dev 10 points 15 hours ago

Helped a disabled pensioner recently with her phone that kept plaging loud obnoxious ads at her even while locked.

She had 4 different "virus scanners" that were all fake adware.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

The fee is 15% below the first $1M of revenue and it should go without saying that app developers only pay that fee for paid apps, in-app purchases or digital subscriptions. It's very unlikely that a scam app would be paid, or work off a subscription, and if those phishing ads are doing their conversions, you'll never see the user again.

I doubt Google's making more than a few cents off each of these scam apps.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 66 points 22 hours ago (9 children)

That's not good enough. They're just going to keep lightly pushing against the bad publicity until everything not controlled by Google on your phone goes away.

We need an alternative made without googles shitty hands in the mix. This forced duopoly between Apple and Google sucks. No phone competition in the US also sucks. Overpriced Samsung or a Google phone, while companies Like Red Magic have fan and liquid cooled phones with huge batteries, more ram, and more storage, for less than a grand being sold around the rest of the world outside the US.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

I'm just waiting for the moment Valve also decides to enter the mobile market :)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 38 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Easing is not removing.

Anything more than a warning and disclaimer popup is too much.

[–] exu@feditown.com 289 points 1 day ago (37 children)

Good, but I still don't trust Google and I really want Linux (you know what I mean) on my next phone.

load more comments (37 replies)
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 188 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's always the same, big shocking announcement, public outcry, pushing forward with a less shocking version, public acceptance, and then rolling out the rest of the initial plan. Why do we keep falling for it?

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its like getting robbed at gunpoint. Not much you can do about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 89 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Users only need to eat half of a shit sandwich!

This is less terrible news, not good news.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (5 children)

… continues to make Play Integrity an integral part of Android and making all the stupid banking and govt apps requiring having it on your phone thus making it harder to de-google.

still no… fuck you.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›