Then again, this entire posts makes it quite clear you don't seem to have any ability to read the room.
Assuming they even read their own post.
Then again, this entire posts makes it quite clear you don't seem to have any ability to read the room.
Assuming they even read their own post.
Hier ist ein Artikel zu dieser Art von "Frage".
Ich unterstelle Merz auch keinen guten Willen. Aber wenn man jemandem ins Angesicht schlechten Willen unterstellt dann wird sich dieser jemand eben verteidigen, egal ob es stimmt oder nicht.
Niemand will menschenverachtend genannt werden, auch nicht die die es sind, sie denken das ja nicht von sich selbst. Das sich also jemand dagegen verteidigt ist keine Nachricht wert.
Lawmakers can provide the law, but "strictly necessary" and "proportionate" are things in the purview of courts and judges.
Check every dictionary for america or american. Or just type "america" on whatever search engine. First thing is always the US or its citizens.
Exactly! It's always the first! Let's check the renowned and proud American dictionary Merriam Webster:

Oh. Huh.
I guess I need to accept that some minds are just skipping records.
Good talk. Goodbye.
His charisma is the ability to get other people to agree with him. The "agreeing" part is the choice of those other people, not his. If Trump has charisma, it's because people let him. It's their personalities who define the effect, not his.
I can understand Trump. He's simply a textbook narcissist. I cannot understand anyone who doesn't understand that, and how that is at least 30% of Americans, and probably not that much less worldwide.
My lack of understanding isn't that he can do it, it's why he can. More specifically, how a human can listen to him even just once and still want to agree with what he says.
Yeah, I don't understand that one either.
Haven't read the article yet, but I guarantee the "hacking messaging apps" is just phishing again.
Hä? Das ist doch genau das Gegenteil.