Patrikvo

joined 1 week ago
[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I used Claude to code something. The thing is, it happilly creates the code, which looks quite professionally, and is soooo positive about itself. Then you try to run it, which ofcourse doesn't work. Next you feed it the error messages and it very very happilly fixes those bugs, all while being very fond of itself. After a few rounds of that, the code actually runs and does something.

Now I can get that it doesn't work from the first try, ours won't be 100% correct either, but the mistakes it makes tend to be because it mixes information of different versions of libraries.

And why is the damn thing so fond of itself? Everything it does it find "perfect".

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

The trick is to start an online business using AI and earn enough money to offset the extra hardware cost caused by AI use.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

it’s a question of whether you can restore a botched system with a few commands and in a realistic amount of time.

A few years ago my employer was the victim of randsomware. We're speaking here about a massive network and all sorts of databases and services build on top of those, spanning decades and many different technologies. Basicly several thousand employees and a decade long focus on working digital and automation. Data restoration was not an issue. I haven't heard of anyone losing data.

However, restarting all the services was not as easy. Many of these depended on each other and there were some circular dependencies that have grown organicily over the years. Took about two months to restore core functionality (mostly SAP and email) and many more months to restore all sorts of support services that were required for normal day-to-day work. Two years after the incident the last applications were back online.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

No, it's a research proposal. Once I get funding, I'm going to need enough staff to handle the crowds that volunteer as test subjects.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I wanted to make a reference to the Midas touch, but the Cheetos touch has a strong icky feeling to it.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

but an open-hardware device running a FOSS AR system? Until these display my health, ammo and the direction to my next objective, I'll pass.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Given the national climate, people were not only glad to have a Democrat come to their door,

To be fair, based on who's going door-to-door these days, that isn't that much of an achiement. Still, each time I read one of these victories, it does make me smile.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Step 1: make an ordered list of drugs, ranking from worst to least. Step 2: get patient addicted to the drug below his current addiction. Step 3: repeat until you're down to cigarettes Step 4: tack on a nicotine patch and mail the bill Step 5: profit!

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be honest, I expect things to get a lot worse after the midterms. I think people still feel like it's something they can do to change things, but after that I won't be surprise to see a lot more of this from both sides.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Exactly, investigate everything even if it takes, say, 3 years.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Easy, just tape a lot of mops around your firebomb. That way, the mops absorb the sprinkler water and keep it from extinguishing the fire. Ofcourse you'd need asbestos mops as normal ones burn up by the firebomb. Another option is to pack a layer of those tiny cocktail umbrellas around the bomb.

Anyway I'm sure both are available from your local Acme store.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't worry, after the immigrants they'll have plenty of room to "help" the poor and the homeless.

view more: next ›