Sharkticon

joined 5 days ago
[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

Should there be a 10-second runoff on a delay a game penalty on the offense?

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

Of course there are lots of them. Lone ranger was a huge one.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

Good lord, like they're even talking about it here in a final two minute drill with the game on the line.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 hours ago

Yeah I'm going to have to push back on the affected part of your comment. As we both agree he hasn't been canceled and as some of those allegations are years old and as your article points out it's basically an Open Secret. Yet he's still been getting movies for years and has more projects on the way. Hell there were a few articles in June like this one when it was posted, but since then basically nothing. If he's affected it's clearly not seriously.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

When was Leto even close to cancelled?

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

Really feel like you should be able to edit the title if it does something stupid like censors the word died.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago

Not just acceptance but also expanding definitions probably. That + has taken on a lot more meanings in the last few decades. A lot of people who didn't think they fit in a narrow definition before now have more options to allow self-determination.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Eh, it's Jasmine Crockett, with her oratorical style I think rips into is plenty fair.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

There's no human right to grift and scam people.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

That's an interesting statement from a company that's owned by Clorox

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 28 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I'm not entirely sure other Christians are capable of impartiality considering the long long history of Christians getting special treatment in our judicial system. You don't have to scratch the surface very hard to find a plethora of disgusting rulings that mentioned Christianity as a mitigating circumstance which allowed for lessened penalties.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 223 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (18 children)

It seems completely logical to me that if a judge claims her Christianity is so vital to her being that she cannot perform duties that don't align with her Christianity then she cannot give fair and impartial judgments to anybody who is not also a Christian. Anybody of any religion that's not Christianity in her courtroom should call for her recusal. Anyone not Christian for whom she has made judgment should call for mistrals.

Not even to mention the fact that can she truly be impartial to other sects of Christianity?

view more: next ›