ech

For whatever reason, our brains developed the inclination/compulsion to imagine scenarios which greatly improved our odds of survival in the wild. In a biological sense, I figure stories and the like trigger that reward center in a way. Why people like different stories would come down to brain chemistry.

I'm sorry for your loss.

I'm not asserting anything or criticizing anyone. You're taking this much more personally than it's intended. All I'm doing here is pointing out the problematic origins of the comic. You asked me to explain why that matters and I did. You're not going to convince me otherwise, and I'm not interested in convincing you either. If anything, it's something for others to consider. Have a good day.

Yes. Making a bad thing the basis of a good thing undercuts the latter and makes the former seem less problematic.

I've actually been thinking a lot lately about how the tendency to only make light of bad things without addressing it does little to diminish it, and in actuality just gives it space to grow and get worse, and this feels like that sort of situation. So I'm addressing the problematic foundation, not letting it fester in obscurity.

"archbishop of banterbury" really got me. Top shelf.

Just wanna point of that the original of this comic is about "the intolerant left". Maybe not the best to spread around.

I'm saying what you're doing currently is a problem. And I'm "still going" because you're still attempting to normalize it and you keep trying to paint me as mentally damaged because I dare to point that out.

Bunch of fucking cowards.

Turns out you don't get to normalize being shitty without rebuke.