Memory-safe and type bugs. Languages can't prevent developers implementing logic bugs.
Which means Israel will reject it. Or drag their feel long enough and commit more genocide so that it requires renegotiation.
Trump doesn't care about Israel, he only cares about himself. He'll only do what's good for Israel as far as it's good for him.
Or, like with Putin and Zelenskyy, as long as Netanyahu was the most recent person to talk to him. But there isn't really a leader on the side of Gaza right now that could oppose Netanyahu.
The utils are producing incorrect values.
It's certainly ethical, if not legal.
You could make a good argument in court, too. Hard to show damages when there's no possibility of profit because you're not selling it.
I mean, it's on brand with everything else these days: https://www.newsweek.com/how-much-trump-worth-depends-how-he-feels-384720
You can fool all of the people some of the time, you can fool some of the people all of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.
No, let's just cut out the cancer. We keep the rest of the US together.
I think Russia would take the other side, and Trump would be glad to accept their help. Newsom wouldn't want it anyway.
I can't name any cases off the top of my head, but I don't see a reasonable court equating hypothetical future earnings with present losses.
Like if it was "he stole my harvest of beans that I was going to sell at market" then yeah the harm is obvious, but when it's "well I'm not selling the beans now, and I'm not planning on selling them in the future, but someday I might, therefore no one else should be able to appreciate beans in the meantime" that's ridiculous. Especially since piracy is not theft; the number of beans has not changed.