Skeptic

330 readers
1 users here now

The skeptic movement is a collective endeavor that promotes the respect for knowledge and truth, methodological naturalism, science, reason, critical thinking, and consumer protection, and aims to distinguish legitimate science from pseudoscience, uphold ideological freedom, understand cognitive biases, address specific flawed or pseudoscientific claims, maintain cultural memory of past pseudosciences and scams, and improve science communication and journalism.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

Director Dan Farah grew up with aliens. As a child of the 80s and 90s, pop culture was awash with extra-terrestrial sightings. “How can you be a kid watching movies like ET and Close Encounters, TV shows like The X Files, and not end up curious about whether or not we’re alone in the universe?” he said in an interview with the Guardian. “And whether or not the US government does, in fact, hold secrets from the public.”

Farah’s exposure to otherworldly beings in fiction kickstarted an interest that’s now morphed into a professional quest, and the subject of his documentary debut – The Age of Disclosure. Here, Farah makes the case that the United States has been hiding, for decades, a fount of information related to UAP (unidentified anomalous phenomena) – the acronym rebrand of the stigma-ridden UFO. ‘80 years of lies and deception’: is this film proof of alien life on Earth? Read more

It would be easy to assume this is the stuff of tin-foil hats and Reddit forums, and in some ways the documentary’s pseudo-narrator, Luis Elizondo, could come across as a type of conspiracy theorist at first glance. He’s armed with a blackboard and piece of chalk, working to sell the viewer, running through a lot of overwhelming military and intelligence jargon, like “hypersonic velocity” and “trans medium travel” with undeniable passion.

But there’s a reason why Farah gravitated towards Elizondo (who also serves as an executive producer on the film). He’s got genuine credentials. A former Pentagon official, who helped lead the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), Elizondo eventually left his role in 2017, claiming the department was hiding vital information from the public. He also claims there was a “powerful disinformation campaign” from the Department of Defense to discredit his work.

Making a point to “only interview people who have direct knowledge” of these programs from working within the US government was a north star for Farah – who has served as a producer on several films, including Steven Spielberg’s Ready Player One. While filming The Age of Disclosure, as more former officials and experts got on board, it helped to convince others to take part.

But Farah ran a tight ship over the three years it took to make the film. “Everyone’s names would be kept silent until it was done,” he said, noting that he only told documentary subjects about who had agreed to take part in order to make them comfortable. “We would make the movie in secrecy, so this information of who’s in it would not get out there until we were done with this film, and these people I was approaching would have safety in numbers.”

Farah also opted to make the film independently, unattached from a studio or streamer. “None of them would ever want to participate in a big commercial documentary,” Farah explained. “They would be afraid of it being sensationalized. They would be afraid of being intercut with someone who was not on their level, who would undermine them.”

One of his early commitments came from Jay Stratton, a defense official who helped start AATIP, and is also an executive producer on the documentary. Stratton had an established career investigating UAP and non-human intelligence life on behalf of the government, and was responsible for briefing senior lawmakers in Congress and the White House. “I have seen with my own eyes non-human craft and non-human beings,” he says plainly at the beginning of the film.

After Stratton agreed to “break his silence” it had tremendous “ripple effects” on the rest of the film, and convinced others to come forward. When the current secretary of state, Marco Rubio, agreed to take part, that escalated things. “Then next thing you know, general Jim Clapper was participating,” Farah said of the former director of national intelligence under Barack Obama, who sat for an interview.

The sheer wealth of contributions, 34 to be exact, from members of Congress across the political spectrum, as well as people with rich national security experience – many of whom might balk at the prospect of a cable news hit let-alone an independent documentary – certainly lends a veneer of credibility. Off the bat you’re confronted with a propulsive string score, and a supercut of former military and intelligence officials ensconced in armchairs. They all offer brief summaries of their CVs, spell out that we are not alone, and why the American public ought to know more about it. a man with a beard Dan Farah. Photograph: Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images

“This [UAP] technology does stuff that we can’t do, and if we can’t figure out what it is or what it wants, or what it’s being used for,” says a former director of aviation security at the National Security Council. The former chief scientist for AATIP claims that those who are tasked with ensuring information about UAPs doesn’t leak “will use whatever tool they can find to try to convince people they shouldn’t come forward”. Meanwhile a former defense official notes that if we’re able to understand the technology that we’re observing, it opens the door to so many “potentially beneficial impacts, including clean energy”.

In many ways, Rubio offers one of the more convincing arguments. He says that much of the research and intelligence about UAPs is on a need-to-know basis, with incoming administrations being left out of the loop on the details. “But that begins to ramp out of control,” he notes, leading to a lack of transparency that might give US adversaries a head start by analyzing UAP technology. It’s a theory that sounds all the more convincing coming from the noted foreign policy hawk, who spent time in the senate spearheading a bipartisan effort to understand more about UAPs.

The geopolitical arms race to reverse engineer UAP technology is, what Farah came to see, one of the biggest reasons behind the alleged cover-up. “You can’t tell your friends without telling your enemies,” Farah says in our interview, reciting one of Stratton’s lines in the documentary. He traces a line from the debunked 1947 Roswell “alien crash retrieval” (generally considered the genesis of modern UAP conspiracies) to what he sees as the ongoing effort to withhold information – for fear of enemies getting wind of how much the US knows about extraterrestrial life.

“Put yourself in the shoes of US government and military officials in the 40s,” Farah said, explaining that, fresh off a second world war victory, the Truman administration couldn’t tell the American people that “we’re in another conflict that we can’t protect anyone from, because we don’t even know anything about it”.

He says this race escalated when the US found out that other countries, like Russia, were capturing and retrieving UAP technology. “Here we are now where the people who run our country are not aware of the facts,” he added. “Those people are supposed to be aware of significant information like this that has high stakes for us. And at a base level, the public deserves to know the truth about fundamental facts, like we’re not alone in the universe.”

In The Age of Disclosure, it’s clear that there is little room for pushback or skepticism, particularly since there’s not a single detractor in the film to serve as a foil to the plethora of resolute interviewees. And Farah, for his part, doesn’t see the need for those voices to cloud the documentary’s throughline. “I think when people watch this movie, one of the realizations will be that the stigma around this topic is completely illogical and makes no sense and is not good for humanity,” he said. “We need the scientific community, not only in the United States, but in every nation, accepting the fact that this is a real situation, this is a valid area of inquiry, and that they should put their brain power towards learning about this and answering a lot of the big questions that remain.”

Testimony is ultimately what film hinges on, and it’s really the only “proof” it can offer. This, for Farah, is more compelling. He believes that “the strongest evidence” is “credible people putting their name and reputation on the line to tell you what they know at great risk”. When it comes to video and photos, the director notes that it would do little to quieten claims that it’s all a hoax. “You could put a picture or a video of the most extraordinary thing on the cover of a major news publication or on major plants on TV, and half the human population would tell you they think it’s AI or they think it’s visual effects,” he said.

As more people, like Elizondo and Stratton, speak out about their experiences, Farah hopes it will encourage more people who have been silenced in the past to reveal the truth. “For way too long, the public has been lied to, kept in the dark, completely misled by a heavily financed and very sophisticated disinformation campaign,” he said.

“I think it is only a matter of time before a sitting US president steps to the podium, and tells the world that we are not the only intelligent life in the universe, and that the United States government intends to lead in this new chapter by ending the era of secrecy and beginning the era of transparency.”

The Age of Disclosure is currently available worldwide to rent or purchase on Prime Video.
2
3
10
Doomsday Scoreboard (doomsday.march1studios.com)
submitted 1 month ago by ooli3@sopuli.xyz to c/skeptic@sh.itjust.works
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
-12
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by ooli2@lemm.ee to c/skeptic@sh.itjust.works
 
 

I dont see the point of downvoting instead of debunking the quackery. Or I dont know how skeptics works anymore

11
12
13
 
 

Ralph Baric's work on gain-of-function research, which includes manipulating viruses in the lab to study their behavior, has faced controversy and blame due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Despite facing public scrutiny and disinformation campaigns, Baric's research played a crucial role in the development and testing of Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine. Baric is now working on a pan-coronavirus vaccine using mRNA technology to address potential future outbreaks.

His efforts are set amid a backdrop of growing public debate around gain-of-function research, with calls for transparency and regulatory oversight. Baric remains dedicated to his work, navigating the threats and public backlash with the support of his scientific community.

Gain-of-function research refers to the study of biological entities, typically viruses, where the entities are genetically manipulated to endow or enhance certain properties or functions. This might involve, for example, increasing the transmissibility of a virus, its virulence, or its ability to infect different species. The primary objective of gain-of-function research is to better understand disease-causing agents, their potential effects, and how they evolve.

14
 
 

The photos of children participating in satanic rituals at school were created by generative artificial intelligence.

The After School Satan Club, organized by The Satanic Temple, hosted a meeting at a public elementary school in Virginia. But these AI-generated photos do not show the club or real children.

15
 
 

The anti-abortion group Live Action recently reshared hidden-camera videos from 2011 that show hired actors posing at multiple Planned Parenthood locations as underage sex workers with their adult sex traffickers.

Planned Parenthood said the videos are edited to show only parts of the conversations between Planned Parenthood employees and the undercover actors. Planned Parenthood fired the employee shown in one video for acting inappropriately; the employee in the other video followed the law and company protocol.

This new post omits that soon after the incidents shown in the videos, Planned Parenthood workers reported the alleged sex trafficking to authorities and fired the non-compliant employee.

16
 
 

A concept to reduce city traffic called the "15-minute city" is being accused by far-right critics as a Communist-style attack on personal freedoms. This urban planning principle aims to locate resources such as grocery stores, schools, and hospitals within walking distance of homes to lower carbon emissions. Opponents, including former President Donald Trump and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, have attacked each other's policies that mirror the 15-minute city concept, twisting it into a narrative of oppressive government control.

Misinformation spread on far-right media platforms suggests that efforts to reduce city traffic equate to surveillance and restriction of movement, likening it to "climate lockdowns" and the "Great Reset."

Despite the conspiracy theories, the plan is designed to reduce transit time and greenhouse gas emissions, improving urban life and combatting climate change.

17
 
 

Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb believes he has found fragments of an alien spacecraft from a meteor dubbed IM1, which crashed off the coast of Papua New Guinea in 2014.

He oversaw a $1.5 million expedition that found 50 tiny spherules, believed to be a steel-titanium alloy, on the Pacific Ocean floor. These objects are much stronger than the iron found in regular meteors, leading Loeb to suggest they may have interstellar origins or could have been made by an advanced extraterrestrial civilization. The findings will be taken to Harvard for further testing.

Loeb, known as the "alien hunter of Harvard," has been controversial for his belief in extraterrestrial life, previously claiming a space rock visible in 2017 was an alien-built technology.

18
 
 

This article (written by D.J. Grothe) explains how Uri Geller, known for bending spoons and claiming supernatural abilities, is not a magician, but a con man.

Despite being debunked numerous times, Geller built his fame and wealth on the deception that his feats were real, which deeply offended the magic community and skeptics.

Surprisingly, the magic community has recently started to embrace Geller, overlooking his controversial past due to his charm and celebrity status. However, Grothe disagrees with this change of heart and with the New York Times' portrayal of Geller as a redeemed entertainer. In Grothe's view, Geller's continued deceptions and lack of remorse should serve as a warning, not as an endorsement of his actions.

19
 
 

This article discusses the effects of vitamin D supplementation on major cardiac events, based on a large randomized controlled trial, the D-Health Trial.

The trial involved 21,315 older Australians and aimed to assess the impact of monthly vitamin D supplementation (60,000 IU) on the incidence of major cardiovascular events. The study found no significant difference in the rate of major cardiovascular events between those receiving vitamin D and those receiving a placebo.

However, a few individual events showed statistically significant differences, albeit very slight. Despite these minor positive results, the trial overall adds to existing research suggesting that vitamin D supplementation offers no significant cardiovascular benefits.

20
 
 

Recently, it was disclosed that the World Health Organization (WHO) is considering reclassifying artificial sweetener aspartame as a 'possible' carcinogen, reigniting long-standing rumors and conspiracy theories about its safety. However, more than 60 scientific bodies worldwide and thousands of studies maintain aspartame's safety for human consumption, barring those with phenylketonuria.

The confusion arises from the complexities of risk research and the misunderstanding of the difference between 'hazard' and 'risk'. The WHO's classification system is focused on hazard potential, not actual risk, and this prospective reclassification of aspartame does not assert it as a definitive cancer-causing agent.

Despite ongoing debates, current evidence still firmly supports that aspartame's consumption levels in humans pose no cancer risk.

21
 
 

Michael Protzman, leader of a JFK-QAnon cult, known as Negative 48, has died following a dirt bike accident.

Protzman, who had tens of thousands of followers on Telegram, promoted conspiracy theories that John F. Kennedy and his son JFK Jr. were still alive. After a failed prediction of their reappearance in Dallas, he altered his conspiracy narratives to keep his followers invested.

His followers, many of whom abandoned families and depleted their savings, still believe in his conspiracies and some think his death is part of a grand plan. A follower has proposed herself as Protzman's successor, and while some predict new conspiracies surrounding his death, others believe his following will gradually move on to other influencers.

22
 
 

A 40-year-old man named Kimbrady Carriker was charged with five counts of murder after shooting victims at random during Independence Day celebrations in Philadelphia.

Despite there being no evidence to suggest that the suspect is transgender, far-right figures and Republican lawmakers falsely claimed him to be and used this to attack the LGBTQ+ community.

The suspect's now-deleted Facebook page displayed numerous posts about his pro-gun stance and support for former President Donald Trump. Images on the account of Carriker with long braided hair and wearing women's clothing were used by far-right members to label him as a "trans shooter".

This event follows a pattern of exploiting tragedies to spread transphobia and undermine LGBTQ+ protections by the far right.

23
24
 
 

The article debunks the antivaccine misinformation campaign by Aaron Siri and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. They cast doubts on the safety and efficacy of vaccines by contesting the use of placebos in clinical trials.

Siri misrepresents the toxicity of vaccine ingredients, using the example of sodium phosphate, whose harm at high doses is misleadingly extrapolated to the minuscule amounts used in vaccines. His deceptive tactics also extend to other vaccine components like polysorbate-80.

However, safety sheets for these substances refer to risks with substantial doses, not the tiny amounts found in vaccines.

The article also emphasizes the importance of ethical considerations in clinical trial designs, which sometimes requires using existing vaccines as controls instead of saline placebos.

25
 
 

Conspiracy beliefs are more common than expected, with half of Americans subscribing to at least one, and their popularity varies depending on political and psychological traits.

A study by Joe Uscinski explored this variance, correlating belief in 39 different conspiracy theories with 15 psychological and political characteristics (Manicheanism, Machiavellianism etc.).

The study found that while conspiratorial thinking was the biggest predictor of individual conspiracy beliefs, psychological traits, such as the dark triad, and political ideologies, such as Manicheanism and populism, were the strongest predictors of a broad range of conspiracy beliefs.

Recognizing these correlations allows for more nuanced approaches in combating misinformation and reaching individuals who previously seemed unreachable.

view more: next ›