this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
209 points (96.9% liked)
science
25363 readers
758 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
dart board;; science bs
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The article doesn't mention if they controlled for income, and a lot of these studies don't. This was famously what debunked the "one to two glasses of wine a week improves your health" since people who drink zero are possibly either too poor to afford wine or alcoholics who are sober, and people who are either poor or who drink more than three per night will have worse health outcomes in general. The people who drink 1-2 have disposable income and are generally otherwise healthy. I wonder if they controlled for caffeine in a similar way, as I could see people who can afford the time and money for 2-3 cups per day are just generally healthier anyway because they might tend to have more disposable income.
It's almost almost always that, innit? It feels so bad reading these articles and just at the back of my mine "they're rich! It's because they're rich! But we can't say that because our paper would get buried!"