News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
To me him being "reasonable" is my main issue with him. He's doing the whole "if we just explain things to Republicans with reason and rationality they will change their minds." These people didn't use reason to get into the positions they are in, and reasoning has not and never will work to get them out of those positions. They are not true Christians as much as they use Christianity as a shield for their shitty behavior, and so reasoning using religion won't work on them either.
Jasmine Crockett is imperfect, absolutely, but she brings the fight and the fire. She isn't afraid to get down and stoop to their level and not hold back. They call names, she calls names, they talk shit, she talks shit. It's not perfect, but it's a way stronger way to fight back than this mealy-mouthed "we just need to explain it to them again" that the Democrats have been doing for my entire fucking lifetime of over forty years and has never worked once to make these people see reason.
Even reasonable religious people aren't enough to change the narrative, and I thought his discussion with Boebert proved that. Because she would just agree with him at every step of the way, and he wouldn't and didn't call her out directly, instead allowed her to weasel out and act like it's other people not living up to Godly standards. He didn't call her out and say "how is vaping and mashing your boyfriends dick in public with your tits half hanging out Godly behavior, ma'am?" Crockett is willing to play that game and get down, mean, and real. She was one of the few people who seemed to have left Pam Bondi speechless during those hearings recently, because she brings the fire, she doesn't back down, and she's willing to get into the mud with them so to speak. On the other hand, Talarico let an easy target, Boebert, walk all over him and he left mountains of ammunition against her on the table and let her pretend she wasn't exactly who he was talking about.
Talarico is just more milquetoast "reasoning" with unreasonable people. He's right on the message, wrong on the delivery.
she's a pistol. when she replied to MTG with "Bleach Blonde, Bad Built, Butch Body" she earned my vote.
That reply really put me off. I don't think appearance based insults are the way. I don't like that this one in particular sideswipes butch lesbians. Those are my friends.
I appreciate that everyone wants to see MTG get her comeuppance, but eh. I think there is plenty to attack her on that doesn't come with collateral damage.
mostly agree, which is why when MTG started talking shit about Crockett's looks, I thought it was a perfect retort.
bitches want to throw hands and not get slapped?