this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
39 points (95.3% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

14023 readers
176 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
02-05 SFA 1x05 "Series Acclimation Mil"
02-12 SFA 1x06 "Come, Let's Away"
02-19 SFA 1x07 TBA
02-26 SFA 1x08 TBA
03-05 SFA 1x09 TBA

In Production

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Starfleet Academy


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

LoglineAs a cadet sets out to solve an ancient Starfleet mystery, she embarks on a journey of self-discovery and learns the value of forging her own path. Meanwhile, Nahla agrees to help a fellow chancellor with an elaborate alien ritual.

Written by: Kirsten Beyer & Tawny Newsome

Directed by: Larry Teng

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wirehead@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's too bad that everybody I know who has a theramin has eventually gotten rid of it. Eventually they realize that it's just sitting there collecting dust because they never touch it.

This one was hard, for me, to get through. SAM is the character who posesses the most cringe and I don't like cringe. And, OK, I have to say "for me" because how many commedians and commedies get most of their mileage with effective use of cringe? So I kinda fast-forwarded a bunch of scenes, started to piece together what was going on, and then went backwards to watch it again.

I thought of it a lot like "Data's Day". Not exactly, because for poor SAM, the stakes are as high as "Measure of a man" instead of completely low stakes. But the structure is the same.

SAM's evolved. They said that they had an idea for SAM's character and then when Kerrice Brooks arrived, they adjusted her characterization based on her and she's a bit different than she was in the past. She scrunches up her face a bit differently this time? Her movement's a bit different? Did they just write a memo somewhere between the production of Ep 4 and 5 "Hey, let's make SAM more Kerrice Brooks?"

There's definitely some fast-forwarding because we don't see SAM learning how to go from the kid who nobody greeted to the kid who gets a new name every time. The Voyager episodes where they were trying to teach Seven how to be more human were super-cringe and I'm actually kinda glad that we skipped over that.

Also I kinda wonder if Ocam's affection for SAM in giving the best greeting is maybe a bit like in Tin Man, where SAM is the only person he doesn't need to filter out.

I never got around to watching all of DS9. When it was on the air, I thought of it as a bit of a Star Trek universe rip-off of Babylon 5 and had stopped bothering to watch TV most of the time, so I never caught either show. And I remember having a vague rant as they started off with Voyager that what we really needed was a next next generation ... which takes us to now, where we have a next next generation that's going back to DS9. And I guess DS9 had a reasonable ending that people are OK with whereas the Babylon 5 fans recommend that you just treat it like the series ends after season four, which is entirely because the studio shenaned. Also, both DS9 and B5 really could use a nice HDTV remaster and aren't getting one.

I guess, as far as the DS9 part of the tale, it's a bit like Deadpool and Wolverine, where they didn't want to revisit or change the ending for the Logan movie and therefore had to zig-zag around the story. And creativity sometimes needs some good constraints because Deadpool and Wolverine worked out quite well. But the ending of DS9 was constrained because of what Avery Brooks required out of the Sisko characterization. He said he'd be back, which was something very important for him to keep, and they couldn't violate that. At the same time, he's retired from acting and overall done with Sisko, which is also his right. So, we end up with Confronting the Unexplainable.

We saw Jake from what he chose to write down, translated into a personality by SAM. We didn't see Jake. So one might assume any number of things ranging from that Ben Sisko came back and Jake didn't record it to something more prosaic. And, I dono, we've lost some of the elders in my family lately and I guess I have thoughts about how one might interpret taking care of someone from beyond the grave that I won't go into. But I can accept how it was written.

I was really really slow. I know what Tawny Newsome looks and sounds like. Illa looked familiar but I couldn't put it together that she was Illa Dax until the reveal and I didn't put it together that it was Tawny. For a few, I thought they'd brought Terry Farrell back because of the Jadzia Dax manerisms being so spot-on at points, then I read that it was Tawny and suddenly it made sense.

It's neat to have a Black co-writer doing an episode that focused on a Black character doing a tribute to a show with the first Black captain. So while there's the very practical story aspects of Jake and SAM, there's also the meta aspect of the Black experience that the show is able to put a mirror to. I loved Sisko as a character and Avery Brooks's interpretation of the character but it's never going to hit me the same way to have seen him for the first time on DS9 as it did for Tawny.

And, conversely, there's no in-universe reason why the form that SAM took had to be a Black girl, but I like the way the puzzle pieces of casting and character and story are fitting together to bring us here.

I was thinking that I really love the trio of Dzolo, B'Avi, and Kyle and was hoping that we'd see more of them so ... we saw more of them. Dzolo and B'Avi always trying to start shit with the two-people one-two punch and Kyle laughing at Jay-Den's jokes instead.

We see Genesis with her hair down in this episode of the first time.

The San Francisco shots look like they've got the extant buildings in the foreground and then substituted skyscrapers as you go back. I am happy that the eyesore that is Salesforce Tower is not present. Whatever out-of-focus building backdrop they found probably in Toronto felt San Francisco enough, LOL.

Digression to San Francisco history, by the way. Today people think of the city as the home of tech and, by extension, tech douchebags. During World War II, it was a critical Navy town for the west coast. There were Navy bars. There was a complicated sort of history for being gay in the military during that era -- Check out Coming Out Under Fire: The History of Gay Men and Women in World War II by Allan Bérubé. The military had to back off on the persecution of gay sailors during WWII because they needed everybody they could have. Drag performers, gay or stright, were men and therefore could be in combat zones and the drag show was a ray of light in dark times. Then between after the war and until they started to draw down the naval presence in San Francisco, where they suddenly didn't need every person they could, they went back to kicking gay people out of the military. Thus, lot of people got kicked out of the Navy for being gay so they'd get cut loose and, being unwilling to return home after being outed, settled down to slummy inexpensive Victorian houses in the unfashionable Castro neighborhood of San Francisco until it became a hotbed of gay culture.

So, a Starfleet bar with a drag queen tending bar where Kyle and Jay-Den (in a skant) share a moment... yeah, that's to the heart of what the city once was and still halfassedly tries to pretend to be.

And, on that, I guess we can go back to a video from 2022 about skants and skirts where it's pointed out that the real thing missing, so far, was that none of the lead male characters appeared in the skant and point out that Jay-Den is one of the leads.

I don't like the intense save-the-universe plotline that is standard in shows these days. But I do appreciate how we've got a lot of call-back to past episodes. We have the change from SAM in the first episode trying to greet people and getting ignored to now having her getting greeted her way. We have the aftermath of the Vitus Reflex prank.

Someone in the writers room has seen Red Dwarf. There's the Gazpacho incident but also there's the whole Rimmer/Lister vibe that Kelrec and Ake have. Except they are stealing like artists, because Kelrec isn't a Rimmer and Ake isn't a Lister.

I think the B plot, Kelrec's big diplomatic incident, was a little squeezed and not quite so engaging, but again it does harken back to Capt Ake's big lesson to the students from ep 3, that you can use patience and empathy to defeat your opponent.

So, yeah, I think I was watching it expecting for this to be the episode that really really really didn't land. It really could have landed really badly. But it came out pretty good, actually and I think that's credit to the writers.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 6 points 3 days ago

An excellent episode and would easily have been my favorite for the season if not for "Vox in Excelso".

[–] Kudusch@startrek.website 8 points 4 days ago

I’m currently rewatching DS9 so I enjoyed this episode thoroughly. The show’s really growing on me.

I’d love to know if it actually resonates with audiences in the age group our cadets are in.

And Tawny Newsome as Professor Illa (last name redacted) was a treat!

[–] dkppunk@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

That episode is my favorite one so far. It was such a great homage to DS9 and I loved seeing adult Jake.

I also super love that they are bringing back the skirt uniform. Jay-Den rocked that outfit! 💚

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It's funny - I knew he would be wearing it at some point, sort of had my eye out for it...and didn't notice it at all when I actually watched the episode.

[–] dkppunk@piefed.social 8 points 4 days ago

I’ve been intentionally avoiding spoilers and previews, so I had no idea it was coming. It was a really happy surprise for me and that episode was so great.

I absolutely adore Sam’s smile, just beautiful!

[–] Stormygeddon@startrek.website 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The B-plot with the ambassadorial dinner thing felt a bit incomplete, and too comic-relief without quite landing. I guess it might keep going with the next episode, but overall this one was a decent exploration about the expectations of life and bearing being thrust into a role.

I wonder if there was more to it that got cut for time. I think it's...fine as it is, if only because Holly Hunter's physicality in the role is a sight to behold. But it doesn't have much to offer besides the further development of the relationship between Ake and Kelrec.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

That was my one gripe with the episode. I enjoyed the B-plot, but it felt disconnected to the rest. And with this episode otherwise serving as such a lovely coda to DS9, I wish they'd have kept it a bit more focused on that.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 5 points 4 days ago

Those two have a Rimmer + Lister feel to them.

[–] buerviper@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So, as someone who is watching the entirety of DS9 for the first time... Spoilers? Lol. But actually, that made me appreciate the episode more.

I really like how this series evolves. The last three episodes were all really good. This DS9 homage felt great in a franchise which is very much TOS/TNG focused.

I did not quite get the "Thank you, Avery" in the end and had to check whether Brooks died? Is it because he retired?

[–] billmason@startrek.website 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Presumably it's a combination of "thank you for what you contributed to Star Trek" and maybe a way to acknowledge him letting them license the final scene narration off of an album he did some 20 years ago.

[–] buerviper@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Makes sense. Apparently he was also creatively involved in the episode to a certain degree.

[–] billmason@startrek.website 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I hadn't heard that, other than they got his blessing basically (and the licensing) and he was given a copy of the script to read. Cirroc Lofton seems to be the one that was as close to hands-on involved as you can get when you're not a writer of the script.

[–] buerviper@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's just something I read on reddit. maybe the "certain degree" was "he read the script and did not object". Maybe they meant this: https://screenrant.com/star-trek-starfleet-academy-avery-brooks-sisko-voice-cameo/

Lofton: ... And so throughout the step-by-step process of this episode developing, he was aware of it. I had his blessing, and I was happy to get the opportunity to do this love story for Sisko.

Newton: ... Ciroc got a phone call, and it was Mr. Brooks, and it was out of the blue. And he was able to put me and Kerrice both on the phone with them, and I won't share the details of the conversation, but what I got to witness was Mr. Brooks unequivocally handing the reins over to Kerrice, to this younger generation.

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I got emotional listening to Jake speak about his father

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I was very moved at how Jake was a truly adult version of the youth we saw in DS9 but that he also had the posture and dignity that Avery Brooks brought to Sisko.

Cirroc Lofton really can act and it’s outrageous if he’s not been getting work if he wants it.

If you’ve seen him as himself in his podcast, there’s no doubt about his performance in this episode.

It makes me very much want to see him cast in something else.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 2 days ago

If the performance was even the slightest bit off an appearance like could have easily come off like nostalgia-bait, but it truly felt like this was SAM's episode and he was a hologram in a history computer.

[–] Kabutor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

wew! I though I was the only one... and the music at the end..

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Cried when Jake appeared the 1st time but at the end it was too much.

Thank you, Avery and all the crew and cast of DS9.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 5 points 4 days ago

Yeah, tears wouldn't stop flowing once they started. It was a good episode.

Damn, I've been enjoying the series more than I ever expected to, but this episode really got me.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Does anyone else have any lingering questions or hypotheses around two nonsequiturs in the episode?

  1. The Bajoran who welcomed Sam said that her “pagh is strong;”
  2. Jake’s holographic reconstruction called Sam ‘sis’.

I’m wondering why and how the photonics chose the form for Sam - and whether her form is based on a real person - such as Sisko and Cassidy’s daughter Rebecca.

I’m also really wondering how a photonic being can have a pagh…

These definitely seem like things that might be followed up on later.

[–] skfsh@startrek.website 10 points 4 days ago

Tawny Newsome was a guest on the Greatest Trek podcast and talked about the parallel nature of having Jake Sisko in character talking to Sam the character, but also having it be a meta conversation of Cirroc Lofton the actor taking on a kind of mentorship role to Kerrice Brooks the actor, in the way that Avery Brooks was a mentor to him on DS9. This plot is why Sam was cast as a Black woman, to make the relationship between two Black characters be more meaningful to the audience, because the show isn't just a story between two fictional space characters but also a dialogue and conversation with the Black fans watching it right now. The 'sis' thing was part of that.

If I were to extrapolate an in-universe reason, it's because Sam is developing this bond with her idea of Sisko the Emissary and how he is becoming a father figure to her, as opposed to her overbearing actual-parents The Makers, that she mentally treats Jake Sisko as the brother she never had. And so her vision of Jake addresses her as 'sis'. He does note that she's the one in control of how this whole dialogue is playing out.

[–] ShaunKL@startrek.website 5 points 4 days ago

I think of pagh as something like Prana or Chi. I imagine Sam’s program gives off vital signs, so someone sensitive to those vital signs would be able to “read” her.

[–] buerviper@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The Pagh thing to me just looked like it was a traditional form of a greeting with no real meaning behind it.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That’s how Sam interpreted it, and it’s why she imitated it / mirrored it back.

But what if it wasn’t pro forma?

[–] buerviper@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

My understanding is that only the religious leaders of Bajor could feel it, if it even was possible to feel it. So some college student shouldn't be able to do it anyway.

I've never been convinced that the ear-grabbing actually did anything. Bareil certainly had no patience for it.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 16 points 6 days ago

Omg, that was incredible. I was moved to tears from the overwhelming joy of each moment. 🥹

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've been pretty excited for this one ever since it was highlighted as a "love letter" to DS9...but I was pretty nervous about a couple of things.

I wasn't sure how the hell they would make it relevant to the cast of this show, and keep them rightly front-and-centre. There was no obvious connection for them to do so, and it wouldn't serve them well to just do a full-on nostalgia fest.

I also wasn't sure how to explore Sisko's fate in a way that felt substantial. It seems like any story about his return would have to be pretty significant (or, alternatively, so insignificant that it would be hard to make an episode about it).

As it turns out, I needn't have worried. They threaded the needle pretty perfectly. SAM was the central character from beginning to end, and her "connection" to Sisko was uniquely intertwined with the character's motivations. And they sidestepped my second issue entirely, but in a way that I still found satisfying.

I feel bad for Ben and Kasidy's kid, though - apparently completely insignificant to the history books.

And I do hope he was able to visit them from time to time.

[–] skfsh@startrek.website 6 points 4 days ago

I think they left it open for the interpretation that Sisko could have visited Jake, Kasidy and maybe even Dax and others, in ways that are lost to time.

Jake's holorecording and his book could have all been completed before Sisko returned. Or he did return prior to those being done, but Jake left those out of the record on purpose. In either case, Sam's recreation of Jake from the record could not have been privy to what the real Jake experienced.

Perhaps Sisko even returned and finished living out a full and complete life with his family, but out of the public eye. It couldn't be recorded it would have disrupted the Bajoran religious mythos too much. I would not put it past Dax to actually know what happened, but make it a point that for the sake of history and culture and religion, that the facts be forever shrouded in mystery. Dancing around the question of Sisko's fate could be a deflection, not an admission of defeat.

"Solving the mystery isn't why we study him." "I did warn you it wasn't solvable." How would you know that for sure, Dax? Unless you're part of it?

[–] Snowcano@startrek.website 9 points 5 days ago

Oh man, it started a little… extra shall we say, but that was really something special! I did not expect this series to be this good.

[–] khaosworks@startrek.website 10 points 5 days ago
[–] billmason@startrek.website 9 points 5 days ago

I'm just replaying the last 30 seconds over and over again and punching my feels into oblivion.

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'll be honest with you, I'm by no means a fan of "nu-trek". couldn't stand Discovery, SNW I enjoyed but then it kinda went belly up, and I only really enjoyed Picard season 3.

So I went into Starfleet Academy and I wasn't optimistic. Utilizing plot points from Discovery made me groan. but I must say this last episode has won me over. It's about time Star Trek does a decent homage to DS9. it's been a long time coming.