sp3ctr4l

joined 8 months ago
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Oh I know.

That's why I just tell them things, and then laugh when they have their reddit style, cliqueish, spasm of hiveminded insulting mockery through their own insular set of memes and phrases that only make sense if you're permaonline in exactly the same way they are.

Then I just block those people.

Not everyone on ML or Hex is completely bonkers.

... But a lot of their mods and admins are.

But but, same with .world!

The internet is a funny place.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Former econometrician here:

Yes. Correct.

Ever since stock buybacks became the bog standard default, and P/E ratios are between 'significantly elevated' and 'completely fucking delusional'...

Yep. None this shit makes any real sense.

Which is actually a huge problem.

Because... the economic 'point' of a stock market, in capitalism, is more or less to act as a kind of giant, collective brain, that figures out how to efficiently and rationally allocate capital and investments.

The 'invisible hand', and all that.

So when that brain spends a decade or two more or less in a euphoric psychotic break... ("irrational exuberance")... well... it doesn't exactly make sound financial choices.

Which translates into about two decades of nonsensical investment of a society's resources.

Free market fundamentalism kind of requires that you assume capital markets are rational and efficient, always.

... But ... they aren't.

Less 'theoretically': Its a giant gambling machine, and if you're not rigging the game yourself, 99.9999% chance you're the mark, you're gonna lose.

And you won't see it coming, not untill its too late for you to get out intact.

Economists have for a long time referred to state run lotteries as effectively an 'idiot tax', because anyone who can do fairly basic statistics also knows they're very likely to lose money, thus, only idiots gamble.

The stock market as it is now more or less represents a more complex version of the same kind of thing... you've got the day traders, and they almost always get their clocks cleaned, they just develop a neurotic-obsessive personality based on 'no, I'm the one guy that can outsmart the market'.

No, you can't.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

... this kid is going places.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

And there's always the George Carlin perspective:


Think of how stupid the average person you meet is.

Now, realize that half the population is dumber than that.


To give some uh, anchoring to this...

The average American adult... a d u l t ...

Is currently as literate as a 5th to 6th grader.

In conclusion; Yes, it is objectively correct to state and believe that most people are idiots, at least if we're talking about the US.

... and Arkansas... is pretty damned close to winning the idiot contest.

"Powerful stupid", you might say.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I hope PBS then starts teaching kids that it's pronounced Ar-Kansas, not Ar-kin-saw.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Hey I mean, honest self-awareness is far more respectable and admirable than blustering bullshit overconfidence and over inflated ego.

"If your cup is full then there is no more room. There is no more room for anything new to get in for any new idea, for any new feeling or thought and so you just have to continue to empty that cup. Continue to pour out and then you have the space for something new to come in and it does require awareness, it does require a desire to be present and to want to figure these sorts of things out.”

  • Bruce Lee
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (5 children)

Why isn't this posted in Leopards Ate My Face?

... this person... trusted... all their files... on someone else's computer?

... they... trusted a giant... tech corporation... to... care about them?

How is this person a developer?

Normally I'd say "clearly this person has never worked in software developement"... but apparently they have, and are just very naive?

... Maybe he just somehow never once spoke with someone who worked with databases ... ???

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Hey, no problem!

Just make A B S O L U T E L Y sure that you get a 16 GB version of the 9060 XT.

AMD did a shitty thing, and released two versions of the 9060XT, one with 8 GB VRAM, one with 16 GB VRAM... but they often have very similar, if not identical names on the packaging, and on online store listings.

Double, Triple, Quadruple check that your 9060 XT is the 16 GB version... don't get scammed!

But uh yeah, just generally speaking, if you're already running CachyOS, and you're fully into Linux Gaming...

AMD is the way to go, they are way way way more open with their drivers than Nvidia, and this just generally results in things working more smoothly.

Also, you could look into OptiScaler, the thing that DeckyFrameGen uses on Steam Decks... basically, there is a whole collections of mods that make it so you can run DLSS on an AMD card, or FSR on an Nvidia card, for a good deal of games... and that works through Proton.

Yeah, an AMD card is probably not gonna run DLSS as well as it runs FSR... but, if you want to try those options, you can.

Its a bit of a procedure to follow though, maybe comparable to doing ENB injection mods back in the day, its a bit more involved than a typical mod that just alters some content in the game.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

They're not.

That meme was invented in China, by Chinese netizens.

Xi didn't like being poked fun at, and added it to the list of censored phrases/images/concepts.

EDIT:

It then later spread to the Western internet, who then memed it further... then China got real mad, did the Great Firewall of China thing real hard...

... and nowadays, we here in the West have a bunch of self described 'leftists' who seem to believe the whole thing was a racist Western meme from the start.

It wasn't.

It was meant to convey Xi as basically derpy, lackadaisical, oafish, childish.

Thats what the CCP took offense to... not any racial stereotypes.

Japanese netizens soon also concluded that their PM at the time, Shinzo Abe, bore a significant resemblance to Eeyore... presumably due to the bags under his eyes, and just generally looking old and tired.

It was based on real world images of Xi meeting Obama. Obama was Tigger, Xi was Pooh, they looked to be walking, ambling along in a good mood.

Here it is, the first iteration of the meme, originating in 2013... from Weibo, a Chinese social media site, sort of similar to Facebook:

... The Chinese user drew Pooh and Tigger, this is not a frame from some previously existing media.

Perhaps unlike a lot of younger modern internet users... I followed all this in real time, I'd graduated uni a year or two prior, was still in my prime shitposting years.

Everyone these days who thinks the whole thing is inherently racist, has always been that way... No.

I remember being on reddit, and us westoids being amused by an, at that time, fairly rare, huge viral meme in China, that was so viral that it made it all the way over to us.

Here's the Twitter post that introduced it to the West:

Ya'll can stop rewriting history, or working yourselves up into hysterics about this... any time you like!

The meme has since grown, again, in China, to basically be a symbol of resistance, given how hard it's been banned, as well as a symbol of opposition to thr CCP in other East Asian and South East Asian countries.

If the whole thing was that... Pooh is yellow, and ... therefore this a racist cariacature... why are Chinese dissidents and citizens of other Asian countries using it as they do?

EDIT 2: I've literally been banned from much of Hexbear and ML, in the past, for pointing this out.

They're just delusional about this.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Labubu, with Chinese Characteristics.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

A Yuri Euro, depicting a date, over shared Gyros.

... possibly with a Yugo in the background.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago

Please, somehow, make it so that if you fold it the right way, it depicts Shinji crying.

 

Lost the things some years back, apparently long enough back that I'm not allowed to use my old rx.

So, got a new rx, new exam, picked out new frames, should be here by Christmas.

 

... Does it basically have to be cozy/cartoony/lighthearted?

Or would games like RimWorld, DwarfFortress, Kenshi, Endzone - A World Apart, Project Zomboid... would they count?

I guess uh yeah, what are the actual bounds of what ya'll would call a 'life-simulation game'?

Apologies if I missed some thread going into more detail than the sidebar, but I don't see anything stickied from my mobile app.

 

A coalition of Democratic lawmakers with military and intelligence backgrounds urged servicemembers and those in the intelligence community to defy any illegal orders.

The video, which is edited to show multiple lawmakers reading one statement, comes as President Trump has carried out deadly boat strikes in the Caribbean, near Venezuela.

“We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now, Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk. This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution,” the lawmakers said in the video.

Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our laws are clear,” they added. “You can refuse illegal orders…you must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our constitution.”

The video features Sens. Elissa Slotkin (Mich.) and Mark Kelly (Ariz.), and Reps. Jason Crow (Colo.), Chissy Houlahan (Pa.), Chris Deluzio (Penn.) and Maggie Goodlander (N.H.).

Since the boat strikes began in September, lawmakers have pressed the Trump administration on whether servicemembers involved could be held legally responsible for deaths that may be found unlawful. The military strikes have killed at least 83 people, and while the Trump administration has accused the boats of ferrying drugs, they have blown them up in deadly strikes rather than the typical practice of interdicting the boats.

DOJ claimed in an internal opinion that servicemembers cannot be held liable for the strikes.

But Senate Judiciary Democrats, in an October letter, argued that the strikes put servicemembers in a difficult position, as they are being asked to make illegal kills.

The United States Code of Military Justice “prohibits the premeditated and unlawful killing of a human being,” they wrote in a letter, but that it also requires obeying orders, “putting our service members in the impossible position of risking criminal prosecution for carrying out an unlawful order to kill civilians or risking prosecution for disobeying superior orders.”


That's the entire article.

Formatting emphasis mine.


Here is the video released by Democrats:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Iux161DZAA

(sorry, New York Post is the only source of the video itself, in its entirety, with no editorializing, that I can find at the moment.)

[EDIT] Thanks to DemBoSain:

https://bsky.app/profile/slotkin.senate.gov/post/3m5vtxjmgnk23


In case you missed it, this came soon after a 427-1 vote by the House of Representatives to release the Epstein Files.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/18/house-approves-epstein-files-bill-in-near-unanimous-vote-00656764

 

A coalition of Democratic lawmakers with military and intelligence backgrounds urged servicemembers and those in the intelligence community to defy any illegal orders.

The video, which is edited to show multiple lawmakers reading one statement, comes as President Trump has carried out deadly boat strikes in the Caribbean, near Venezuela.

“We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now, Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk. This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution,” the lawmakers said in the video.

Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our laws are clear,” they added. “You can refuse illegal orders…you must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our constitution.”

The video features Sens. Elissa Slotkin (Mich.) and Mark Kelly (Ariz.), and Reps. Jason Crow (Colo.), Chissy Houlahan (Pa.), Chris Deluzio (Penn.) and Maggie Goodlander (N.H.).

Since the boat strikes began in September, lawmakers have pressed the Trump administration on whether servicemembers involved could be held legally responsible for deaths that may be found unlawful. The military strikes have killed at least 83 people, and while the Trump administration has accused the boats of ferrying drugs, they have blown them up in deadly strikes rather than the typical practice of interdicting the boats.

DOJ claimed in an internal opinion that servicemembers cannot be held liable for the strikes.

But Senate Judiciary Democrats, in an October letter, argued that the strikes put servicemembers in a difficult position, as they are being asked to make illegal kills.

The United States Code of Military Justice “prohibits the premeditated and unlawful killing of a human being,” they wrote in a letter, but that it also requires obeying orders, “putting our service members in the impossible position of risking criminal prosecution for carrying out an unlawful order to kill civilians or risking prosecution for disobeying superior orders.”


That's the entire article.

Formatting emphasis mine.


Here is the video released by Democrats:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Iux161DZAA

(sorry, New York Post is the only source of the video itself, in its entirety, with no editorializing, that I can find at the moment.)

[EDIT] Thanks to DemBoSain:

https://bsky.app/profile/slotkin.senate.gov/post/3m5vtxjmgnk23


In case you missed it, this came soon after a 427-1 vote by the House of Representatives to release the Epstein Files.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/18/house-approves-epstein-files-bill-in-near-unanimous-vote-00656764

 

A coalition of Democratic lawmakers with military and intelligence backgrounds urged servicemembers and those in the intelligence community to defy any illegal orders.

The video, which is edited to show multiple lawmakers reading one statement, comes as President Trump has carried out deadly boat strikes in the Caribbean, near Venezuela.

“We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now, Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk. This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution,” the lawmakers said in the video.

Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our laws are clear,” they added. “You can refuse illegal orders…you must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our constitution.”

The video features Sens. Elissa Slotkin (Mich.) and Mark Kelly (Ariz.), and Reps. Jason Crow (Colo.), Chissy Houlahan (Pa.), Chris Deluzio (Penn.) and Maggie Goodlander (N.H.).

Since the boat strikes began in September, lawmakers have pressed the Trump administration on whether servicemembers involved could be held legally responsible for deaths that may be found unlawful. The military strikes have killed at least 83 people, and while the Trump administration has accused the boats of ferrying drugs, they have blown them up in deadly strikes rather than the typical practice of interdicting the boats.

DOJ claimed in an internal opinion that servicemembers cannot be held liable for the strikes.

But Senate Judiciary Democrats, in an October letter, argued that the strikes put servicemembers in a difficult position, as they are being asked to make illegal kills.

The United States Code of Military Justice “prohibits the premeditated and unlawful killing of a human being,” they wrote in a letter, but that it also requires obeying orders, “putting our service members in the impossible position of risking criminal prosecution for carrying out an unlawful order to kill civilians or risking prosecution for disobeying superior orders.”


That's the entire article.

Formatting emphasis mine.


Here is the video released by Democrats:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Iux161DZAA

(sorry, New York Post is the only source of the video itself, in its entirety, with no editorializing, that I can find at the moment.)

[EDIT] Thanks to DemBoSain:

https://bsky.app/profile/slotkin.senate.gov/post/3m5vtxjmgnk23


In case you missed it, this came soon after a 427-1 vote by the House of Representatives to release the Epstein Files.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/18/house-approves-epstein-files-bill-in-near-unanimous-vote-00656764

 

A coalition of Democratic lawmakers with military and intelligence backgrounds urged servicemembers and those in the intelligence community to defy any illegal orders.

The video, which is edited to show multiple lawmakers reading one statement, comes as President Trump has carried out deadly boat strikes in the Caribbean, near Venezuela.

“We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now, Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk. This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution,” the lawmakers said in the video.

Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our laws are clear,” they added. “You can refuse illegal orders…you must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our constitution.”

The video features Sens. Elissa Slotkin (Mich.) and Mark Kelly (Ariz.), and Reps. Jason Crow (Colo.), Chissy Houlahan (Pa.), Chris Deluzio (Penn.) and Maggie Goodlander (N.H.).

Since the boat strikes began in September, lawmakers have pressed the Trump administration on whether servicemembers involved could be held legally responsible for deaths that may be found unlawful. The military strikes have killed at least 83 people, and while the Trump administration has accused the boats of ferrying drugs, they have blown them up in deadly strikes rather than the typical practice of interdicting the boats.

DOJ claimed in an internal opinion that servicemembers cannot be held liable for the strikes.

But Senate Judiciary Democrats, in an October letter, argued that the strikes put servicemembers in a difficult position, as they are being asked to make illegal kills.

The United States Code of Military Justice “prohibits the premeditated and unlawful killing of a human being,” they wrote in a letter, but that it also requires obeying orders, “putting our service members in the impossible position of risking criminal prosecution for carrying out an unlawful order to kill civilians or risking prosecution for disobeying superior orders.”


That's the entire article.

Formatting emphasis mine.


Here is the video released by Democrats:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Iux161DZAA

(sorry, New York Post is the only source of the video itself, in its entirety, with no editorializing, that I can find at the moment.)

[EDIT] Thanks to DemBoSain:

https://bsky.app/profile/slotkin.senate.gov/post/3m5vtxjmgnk23


In case you missed it, this came soon after a 427-1 vote by the House of Representatives to release the Epstein Files.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/18/house-approves-epstein-files-bill-in-near-unanimous-vote-00656764

 

A coalition of Democratic lawmakers with military and intelligence backgrounds urged servicemembers and those in the intelligence community to defy any illegal orders.

The video, which is edited to show multiple lawmakers reading one statement, comes as President Trump has carried out deadly boat strikes in the Caribbean, near Venezuela.

“We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now, Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk. This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution,” the lawmakers said in the video.

Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our laws are clear,” they added. “You can refuse illegal orders…you must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our constitution.”

The video features Sens. Elissa Slotkin (Mich.) and Mark Kelly (Ariz.), and Reps. Jason Crow (Colo.), Chissy Houlahan (Pa.), Chris Deluzio (Penn.) and Maggie Goodlander (N.H.).

Since the boat strikes began in September, lawmakers have pressed the Trump administration on whether servicemembers involved could be held legally responsible for deaths that may be found unlawful. The military strikes have killed at least 83 people, and while the Trump administration has accused the boats of ferrying drugs, they have blown them up in deadly strikes rather than the typical practice of interdicting the boats.

DOJ claimed in an internal opinion that servicemembers cannot be held liable for the strikes.

But Senate Judiciary Democrats, in an October letter, argued that the strikes put servicemembers in a difficult position, as they are being asked to make illegal kills.

The United States Code of Military Justice “prohibits the premeditated and unlawful killing of a human being,” they wrote in a letter, but that it also requires obeying orders, “putting our service members in the impossible position of risking criminal prosecution for carrying out an unlawful order to kill civilians or risking prosecution for disobeying superior orders.”


That's the entire article.

Formatting emphasis mine.


Here is the video released by Democrats:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Iux161DZAA

(sorry, New York Post is the only source of the video itself, in its entirety, with no editorializing, that I can find at the moment.)

[EDIT] Thanks to DemBoSain:

https://bsky.app/profile/slotkin.senate.gov/post/3m5vtxjmgnk23


In case you missed it, this came soon after a 427-1 vote by the House of Representatives to release the Epstein Files.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/18/house-approves-epstein-files-bill-in-near-unanimous-vote-00656764

 

Following on from the success of the Steam Deck, Valve is creating its very own ecosystem of products. The Steam Frame, Steam Machine, and Steam Controller are all set to launch in the new year. We've tried each of them and here's what you need to know about each one.

"From the Frame to the Controller to the Machine, we're a fairly small industrial design team here, and we really made sure it felt like a family of devices, even to the slightest detail," Clement Gallois, a designer at Valve, tells me during a recent visit to Valve HQ. "How it feels, the buttons, how they react… everything belongs and works together kind of seamlessly."

For more detail, make sure to check out our in-depth stories linked below:


Steam Frame: Valve's new wireless VR headset

Steam Machine: Compact living room gaming box

Steam Controller: A controller to replace your mouse


Valve's official video announcement.


So uh, ahem.

Yes.

Valve can indeed count to three.

 

Following on from the success of the Steam Deck, Valve is creating its very own ecosystem of products. The Steam Frame, Steam Machine, and Steam Controller are all set to launch in the new year. We've tried each of them and here's what you need to know about each one.

"From the Frame to the Controller to the Machine, we're a fairly small industrial design team here, and we really made sure it felt like a family of devices, even to the slightest detail," Clement Gallois, a designer at Valve, tells me during a recent visit to Valve HQ. "How it feels, the buttons, how they react… everything belongs and works together kind of seamlessly."

For more detail, make sure to check out our in-depth stories linked below:


Steam Frame: Valve's new wireless VR headset

Steam Machine: Compact living room gaming box

Steam Controller: A controller to replace your mouse


Valve's official video announcement.


So uh, ahem.

Yes.

Valve can indeed count to three.

 

Following on from the success of the Steam Deck, Valve is creating its very own ecosystem of products. The Steam Frame, Steam Machine, and Steam Controller are all set to launch in the new year. We've tried each of them and here's what you need to know about each one.

"From the Frame to the Controller to the Machine, we're a fairly small industrial design team here, and we really made sure it felt like a family of devices, even to the slightest detail," Clement Gallois, a designer at Valve, tells me during a recent visit to Valve HQ. "How it feels, the buttons, how they react… everything belongs and works together kind of seamlessly."

For more detail, make sure to check out our in-depth stories linked below:


Steam Frame: Valve's new wireless VR headset

Steam Machine: Compact living room gaming box

Steam Controller: A controller to replace your mouse


Valve's official video announcement.


So uh, ahem.

Yes.

Valve can indeed count to three.

 

Following on from the success of the Steam Deck, Valve is creating its very own ecosystem of products. The Steam Frame, Steam Machine, and Steam Controller are all set to launch in the new year. We've tried each of them and here's what you need to know about each one.

"From the Frame to the Controller to the Machine, we're a fairly small industrial design team here, and we really made sure it felt like a family of devices, even to the slightest detail," Clement Gallois, a designer at Valve, tells me during a recent visit to Valve HQ. "How it feels, the buttons, how they react… everything belongs and works together kind of seamlessly."

For more detail, make sure to check out our in-depth stories linked below:


Steam Frame: Valve's new wireless VR headset

Steam Machine: Compact living room gaming box

Steam Controller: A controller to replace your mouse


Valve's official video announcement.


So uh, ahem.

Yes.

Valve can indeed count to three.

 

Following on from the success of the Steam Deck, Valve is creating its very own ecosystem of products. The Steam Frame, Steam Machine, and Steam Controller are all set to launch in the new year. We've tried each of them and here's what you need to know about each one.

"From the Frame to the Controller to the Machine, we're a fairly small industrial design team here, and we really made sure it felt like a family of devices, even to the slightest detail," Clement Gallois, a designer at Valve, tells me during a recent visit to Valve HQ. "How it feels, the buttons, how they react… everything belongs and works together kind of seamlessly."

For more detail, make sure to check out our in-depth stories linked below:


Steam Frame: Valve's new wireless VR headset

Steam Machine: Compact living room gaming box

Steam Controller: A controller to replace your mouse


Valve's official video announcement.


So uh, ahem.

Yes.

Valve can indeed count to three.

view more: next ›