Conservative

583 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a conservative forum. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28105782

Generated Summary below:

Main Topic: The video discusses the US government's new policy of monitoring immigrants' social media for anti-semitism (defined as criticism of Israel) and the implications for free speech. It also highlights a debate between Glenn Greenwald and Megyn Kelly on the issue.

Key Points:

  • DHS Social Media Screening: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will begin screening aliens' social media activity for anti-semitism, potentially denying immigration benefits based on their online expression.
  • Definition of Anti-Semitism: The video argues that the government's definition of anti-semitism includes criticism of Israel, effectively policing immigrant applicants' views on Israeli policies.
  • Double Standard: The speaker claims a double standard exists, where advocating violence against Palestinians is tolerated, but criticizing Israel is not.
  • Glenn Greenwald vs. Megyn Kelly: The video references a debate between Glenn Greenwald and Megyn Kelly, where Greenwald criticized Kelly's mischaracterization of protests related to Israel.
  • Free Speech Concerns: The speaker emphasizes that free speech should be defended for everyone, regardless of their views, and that the new policy represents an abandonment of this principle.
  • Rise of Anti-Semitism: The speaker suggests that the actions of the Israeli government and the censorship of criticism may contribute to the rise of anti-semitism.
  • Chosen People: The speaker claims that the idea of Jews being the "chosen people" is supremacist.
  • Narrative Control: The speaker claims that the censorship is about narrative control.

Highlights:

  • The speaker strongly criticizes the Trump administration's policy as a form of censorship targeting critics of Israel.
  • The speaker questions Megyn Kelly's stance, suggesting she doesn't genuinely believe in her arguments.
  • The speaker argues that the policy is counterproductive and may fuel anti-semitism.
  • The speaker claims that Israel is a Jewish supremacist state.

About Channel:

#TheJimmyDoreShow is a hilarious and irreverent take on news, politics and culture featuring Jimmy Dore, a professional stand up comedian, author and podcaster. The show is also broadcast on Pacifica Radio Network stations throughout the country.

“Jimmy Dore is outrageous and outraged, bothersome and bothered. A crucial, profane, passionate voice for progressives and free-thinkers in 21st century America. Jimmy will anger you if you’re a conservative and enrage you if you’re a liberal.”—Patton Oswalt

2
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28013499

Generated Summary below:


Video Description:

Tim Pool, known for his anti-establishment journalism, recently admitted to sitting in a private meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu under a confidentiality agreement known as the Chatham House Rule. This revelation raises serious concerns about the independence of influencers and journalists—individuals we trust because we believe they aren't controlled by the powers they challenge.

But what does the Chatham House Rule actually mean? In essence, it allows participants to share what was discussed but prohibits them from revealing the identity of the speaker or where the information came from. Created in 1927, it was designed for diplomacy, but now it’s being used in closed-door meetings with influencers—not diplomats or traditional journalists.

In this video, we dive deep into the implications of this secretive meeting and the troubling reality that influencers may be unknowingly—or knowingly—becoming conduits for government narratives.

The key players in the room included not only Tim Pool but also other prominent figures like Dave Rubin, Sean Spicer, and Mollie Hemingway. On the Israeli side, Netanyahu and his top diplomats were present. What was discussed? The growing anti-Israel backlash in right-wing media, particularly among pro-Trump influencers, and the possibility of foreign manipulation of social media content.

The question remains: If these influencers aren't being transparent with us, can we still trust their "independent" content? This meeting, shrouded in secrecy, highlights a deeper problem: narrative control, message laundering, and the growing blurring of lines between independent media and government propaganda.

Don’t miss this in-depth analysis of a crucial issue affecting alternative media today!


Generated Summary:

  • Main Topic: The video discusses Tim Pool's participation in a private meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu under the Chatham House Rule and questions the ethics of independent journalists and influencers attending such meetings.

  • Key Points:

    • Tim Pool attended a private meeting with Netanyahu under the Chatham House Rule, which prevents attendees from revealing who said what.
    • The meeting aimed to address growing anti-Israel sentiment in right-wing media.
    • The video argues that the Chatham House Rule is inappropriate for journalists as it can lead to "narrative laundering," where talking points from a foreign power are repackaged as independent thought.
    • The video questions the independence of influencers who attend such meetings and then disseminate information without disclosing the source.
    • The video shares a personal anecdote about the host's experience with Tim Pool's staff, suggesting a pre-programmed pro-Israel stance.
    • The video suggests that manipulation of speech is a greater threat than censorship.
  • Highlights:

    • The video emphasizes the potential for foreign governments to influence public opinion through influencers.
    • The video criticizes Tim Pool for participating in the meeting and potentially disseminating information without full transparency.
    • The video raises concerns about the erosion of trust in independent media.

About Channel:

Independent analysis of today’s politics. Foreign Policy, Pandemic, Elections and More. I don’t fall in line when the line leads to Bullshit.

The Kim Iversen Show is a fully independent program produced for your entertainment and information. The one hour show airs live M-F at 5pm PT / 8pm ET at www.TheKimIversenShow.com. Clips from the program are published to YouTube daily.

3
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28003314

Generated Summary below:


Video Description:

Dave Smith brings you the latest in politics! On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave is joined by co-host Robbie "The Fire" Bernstein to discuss Sam Harris calling out Dave's appearance on the Joe Rogan experience, Gad Saad's reply, and more.


Generated Summary:

Main Topic:

Dave Smith responds to Sam Harris's criticism of him and Joe Rogan, particularly regarding Smith's views on Israel and Palestine and Harris's accusations of spreading misinformation.

Key Points:

  • Sam Harris's Criticism: Harris criticizes Joe Rogan for platforming Dave Smith and others he deems to be spreading misinformation, particularly regarding Israel and Palestine and historical events like the Holocaust and World War II. Harris suggests Rogan should have fact-checkers to prevent the spread of misinformation.
  • Dave Smith's Rebuttal: Smith argues that Harris is engaging in an appeal to authority and is being intellectually dishonest. He challenges Harris to specifically address and refute his arguments instead of simply labeling him a "misinformation artist." Smith points out the hypocrisy of Harris, given the corporate media's track record on issues like COVID-19.
  • Gad Saad's Defense of Free Speech: Smith discusses Gad Saad's video defending Rogan's right to have diverse guests, even those with controversial views. Smith appreciates Saad's principled stance on free speech, even though they disagree on the Israel-Palestine issue.
  • Insecurity in Harris's Position: Smith suggests that Harris's call for censorship and fact-checkers stems from an insecurity in his own arguments. If Harris were confident in his position, he would engage in debate and dismantle Smith's arguments directly.
  • Corporate Media Distrust: Smith highlights the distrust in corporate media, arguing that people trust Joe Rogan more because he is perceived as authentic and not beholden to a particular agenda.

Highlights:

  • Smith mocks Harris's suggestion that Rogan hire fact-checkers, pointing out the irony given the corporate media's failures.
  • Smith emphasizes the importance of open debate and challenges Harris to engage with his arguments directly.
  • Smith expresses appreciation for Gad Saad's defense of free speech, even though they disagree on the Israel-Palestine issue.
  • Smith sarcastically suggests that Kamala Harris didn't go on the Joe Rogan show because the Democratic propaganda wouldn't hold up in an honest conversation.

About Channel:

Dave Smith and Robbie The Fire Bernstein bring you the latest in Politics three times a week, with the promise of bonus episodes! Libertarian Philosophy mixed with a sense of humor, POTP is one of the leading voices in libertarianism.

4
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28001769

Generated Summary below:

Main Topic: The video discusses Dave Smith's disappointment with Donald Trump's administration and the performance of figures like Tulsi Gabbard, RFK Jr., and Kash Patel, who were initially seen as potential positive influences.

Key Points:

  • Squandered Mandate: Dave Smith believes Trump and those he brought into his administration wasted a significant opportunity to enact meaningful change.
  • Disappointment with Individuals:
    • Tulsi Gabbard: Criticized for being inconsistent and potentially an "op" (operative).
    • Kash Patel: Accused of prioritizing partisan politics and failing to address alleged government corruption, despite previously focusing on it. Also criticized for writing a children's book that glorified Trump.
    • RFK Jr.: Criticized for focusing on anti-semitism rather than health issues and for being inexperienced and erratic in his role, including accidentally firing 20% of his staff.
  • Trump's Priorities: The speakers argue that Trump's priorities have shifted to targeting vulnerable groups like immigrants and student protesters, and that his appointees are now focused on executing these priorities.
  • Predictability: The speakers emphasize that the negative outcomes were predictable based on the individuals' past behavior and Trump's signals.
  • Deep State: The speakers suggest that Trump is not opposing the deep state, but rather an option for it.

Highlights:

  • Dave Smith's strong criticism of figures he once likely supported or saw potential in.
  • The assertion that these individuals were "obviously" going to disappoint.
  • The comparison of Trump's administration to fascism, accusing it of targeting the vulnerable.
  • The claim that Tulsi Gabbard is an "op" working for the deep state.

About Channel:

the post-civilization left

Due Dissidence is a multimedia one-stop shop for left politics and gallows humor in written, audio, and video form.

5
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/27997001

Generated Summary below:

Main Topic: Matt Taibbi is suing Democratic Representative [Sydney Kamlager-Dove] for defamation after she called him a "serial sexual harasser" during a congressional hearing and on social media.

Key Points:

  • Matt Taibbi reported on the Twitter Files, exposing government censorship efforts, which led to attacks from Democratic partisans.
  • During a congressional hearing on government censorship, Representative [Sydney Kamlager-Dove] called Taibbi a "serial sexual harasser" and entered articles into the record smearing him.
  • Dove repeated the accusation on social media after the hearing.
  • Taibbi is suing Dove for $10 million for libel, citing her social media post.
  • The accusations stem from satirical pieces Taibbi wrote in the 1990s while living in Russia, which satirized how Americans treat Russian women.
  • No woman has ever accused Taibbi of sexual harassment.
  • This is not the first time Taibbi has been attacked by a Democratic member of Congress; Stacy Plaskett previously called him a "so-called journalist."
  • The speaker believes Dove should at the very least apologize to Taibbi.

Highlights:

  • The representative's claims are based on satirical writing from decades ago and are demonstrably false.
  • Taibbi's lawsuit is a direct response to the representative repeating the defamatory claims on social media, where she doesn't have the same protections as in Congress.
  • The speaker emphasizes the malicious nature of the attacks, suggesting they are intended to discredit Taibbi's reporting on government censorship.

About Channel:

#TheJimmyDoreShow is a hilarious and irreverent take on news, politics and culture featuring Jimmy Dore, a professional stand up comedian, author and podcaster. The show is also broadcast on Pacifica Radio Network stations throughout the country.

“Jimmy Dore is outrageous and outraged, bothersome and bothered. A crucial, profane, passionate voice for progressives and free-thinkers in 21st century America. Jimmy will anger you if you’re a conservative and enrage you if you’re a liberal.”—Patton Oswalt

6
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28002151

Generated Summary below:


Video Description:

In this video, we break down the explosive meeting between President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The conversation covered high-stakes topics including Iran, with Netanyahu pushing for zero nuclear facilities and Trump expressing openness to direct talks—catching Netanyahu visibly off guard. Trump also urged Netanyahu to accommodate Turkish President Erdogan, calling him a friend, and declined to commit to easing tariffs on Israel while pointing out the $4 billion in annual U.S. aid. Additional moments include Netanyahu’s public appearances, discussions on the $1 trillion Pentagon budget, and the broader geopolitical implications of U.S.-Israel relations.

Watch the key clips: Netanyahu on bombing Iran, Trump on talks with Iran, Netanyahu’s reaction, Trump on Erdogan, the Israel tariffs discussion, Netanyahu meeting world leaders, and commentary on the Pentagon budget.


Generated Summary:

Main Topic:

The video analyzes the meeting between President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, highlighting the friction and tension that arose due to differing views on Iran and trade.

Key Points:

  • Iran Negotiations: Trump announced the beginning of negotiations with Iran, a move that unnerved Netanyahu, who views Iran as an existential threat and prefers a "Libyan model" approach (dismantling of installations under US supervision).
  • Trade and Tariffs: Netanyahu sought to lift tariffs on Israeli imports, but Trump reminded him of the significant US military aid Israel receives, suggesting an unwillingness to grant further economic favors.
  • Turkey Relationship: Trump mentioned his good relationship with Erdogan and offered to mediate any issues between Turkey and Israel, further signaling a shift in US priorities.
  • No Joint Press Conference: The cancellation of the joint press conference indicated the meeting's failure to achieve alignment.
  • US Military Spending: The video contrasts Trump's campaign promises of inward focus with the reality of expanding the Pentagon budget and entertaining foreign leaders advocating for military action.

Highlights:

  • The video emphasizes the contrast between Trump's desire for diplomacy with Iran and Netanyahu's preference for a more aggressive approach.
  • It points out the potential shift in the US-Israeli alliance due to diverging interests, particularly regarding economic burdens and foreign policy strategies.
  • The analyst suggests that Trump's actions represent a rare instance of a US president pushing back against Israeli influence on American foreign policy.

About Channel:

Independent analysis of today’s politics. Foreign Policy, Pandemic, Elections and More. I don’t fall in line when the line leads to Bullshit.

The Kim Iversen Show is a fully independent program produced for your entertainment and information. The one hour show airs live M-F at 5pm PT / 8pm ET at www.TheKimIversenShow.com. Clips from the program are published to YouTube daily.

7
 
 
8
 
 
9
 
 
10
 
 

a) He is no closer to ending the Russia-Ukraine war.

b) He is no close to ending the Israel-Gaza war.

c) He is bombing Yemen now.

11
 
 

Minnesota Republicans are calling for the resignation of a state senator police arrested Monday on suspicion of seeking sex from someone he believed was a minor.

12
 
 

Edit: So sorry guys, there seems to have been a mixup. Here's the link to the article that goes with the title: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/social-media-explodes-after-dems-do-not-stand-for-13-year-old-cancer-survivor.amp

A couple quotes from the article:

"Democrats refused to stand for the brain cancer surviving kid! How awful can one party be?" Outkick founder Clay Travis tweeted.

"This is the first time I can remember crying during a state of the union. Thank you President Trump," Meghan McCain posted. "This is so beautiful. Anyone who has been impacted by brain cancer knows how special this is."

For those that don't want to click the link: Apparently some kid that survived cancer that wanted to be a cop got showcased at the state of the union address and democrats wouldn't give him a standing ovation. Can you imagine anything more cold hearted?

13
112
Word. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 months ago by karl_chungus@lemm.ee to c/conservative@lemm.ee
 
 
14
 
 
15
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/58591170

16
 
 
17
 
 
18
 
 
19
 
 

My favorite recent example of conservative mask slippage on TV.

20
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/58139906

21
22
 
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/34161725

“Donald Trump and my cousin clearly believe they can placate Vladimir Putin,” Nate Vance said to Le Figaro, as translated by Google. Invoking a moniker historically often applied to people who are taken advantage of by ruthless political leaders, Nate Vance continued: “They are wrong. The Russians are not about to forget our support for Ukraine. We are Vladimir Putin’s useful idiots.”

“When he criticized aid to Ukraine, I told myself that it was because he had to please a certain electorate, that it was a game of politics,” Nate Vance said.

Nate Vance specifically took aim at JD Vance’s remarks to Zelenskyy that Vance had “watched and seen … stories” justifying his distrust of Ukraine and its president.

“I thought I was going to choke,” Nate Vance reportedly added. “His own cousin was on the frontlines. I could have told him the truth, without personal interest. He never tried to find out more.”

23
 
 
24
 
 
25
view more: next ›