this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
85 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38713 readers
334 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sxan@midwest.social 106 points 5 months ago (18 children)

Your Mastodon and Lemmy (and all other ActivityPub-talkin' platforms) posts certainly are. I'm not sure it's even technically possible to have federation without being open to AI ETLs. A centralized platform, maybe, but I expect this is the price we pay for decentralization.

[–] bloup@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

in a practical sense you’re completely right. However in a legal sense, I am not sure implementing ActivityPub on your website and not restricting federation doesn’t mean you’re not allowed to still impose legal conditions on access to the data that your website is hosting. I am not sure that the nature of the protocol completely absolves you of liability.

to be extra clear. I am not making any kind of claims here. I’m only saying that I am not sure the answer is a simple one

[–] lemmy@acqrs.co.uk 9 points 5 months ago

I'm sure you're allowed to impose legal conditions on your data, but the AI folks have very clearly shown they don't care and would prefer to just fight it out in court years and years later, if ever.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)