this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
449 points (96.5% liked)

Curated Tumblr

5069 readers
8 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Here are some OCR tools to assist you in transcribing posts:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 44 points 3 months ago (36 children)

One of the main things I learned during my economics degree is that money is fake.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social -1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

And I suspect you might even suggest the only real aspect of economics boils down to supply vs demand regardless of what the thing in supply or demand is?

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Definitely not. The rules behind supply and demand hinge on some extremely flimsy assumptions, namely:

  • that people always act in their own best interest (they fucking don't)
  • that people can actually choose not to buy the product

For things like food, housing, medicine, etc. People don't get the luxury of voting with their wallets, and this is why the free market cannot allocate resources effectively.

Just because I went to school for economics does not mean I am a free market capitalist. I'm definitely not.

[–] konki@lemmy.one 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
  • that people always act in their own best interest (they fucking don't)

Totally agree

  • that people can actually choose not to buy the product

This is actually pretty well deacrived by what's called the price elasticity of demand in standard neoclassical models. For things like housing one might say that the demand is very inellastic: A change in price does not affect the quatity demanded.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Yes exactly. This is why I find it funny when they use two different, yet contradictory reasons to justify the sin tax:

  • it prevents people from using it because they'll choose not to use it (the thing they're addicted to) if it gets too expensive; and,
  • the demand is very inelastic which means the government will make more revenue

When really they're primarily taxing the things poor people are addicted to.

Idk, I'm generalizing, I'm just kind of pointing out how a lot of the supports capitalism rests on are weird little opaque excuses to convince the masses that exploitation is what's best for us

So many economists are stuck in a box of what our society has been, they can't think past our current rules and regulations to what could be, because they think that the rules and trends they learn in school are the only possibility, or that profit must be king.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)