this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
944 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

70395 readers
3711 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
944
The Cybertruck Appears to Be More Deadly Than the Infamous Ford Pinto, According to a New Analysis (futurism.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
NSFW 172 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

At the current rate of horrible fiery deaths, FuelArc projects the Cybertruck will have 14.52 fatalities per 100,000 units — far eclipsing the Pinto's 0.85. (In absolute terms, FuelArc found, 27 Pinto drivers died in fires, while five Cybertruck drivers have suffered the same fate, at least so far.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 205 points 3 months ago (26 children)

I love Elon Bad posts, but I think it's worthwhile to examine why Elon bad in this case.

Like many reactionaries, Elon's business philosophy is pure tech-bro-libertarianism. And like all libertarians, he's stuck in the neoliberal mindset of less regulation (don't scrutinize) and more efficiency (let me be cheap), in order to create the safe space that industrialists need to ~~extract~~, er create.

He's literally said things like (paraphrasing)

When I see a specification for three bolts I ask: why can't we do it with two?

His transparent reasoning is that if he's allowed to cut corners, he'll save money today and consequences can be dealt with when they arise.

He's following the software model of release a minimally viable product and patch it later. Only instead of user frustration at being beta testers, you fucking die maybe.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago (6 children)

You can't use "literally" and "paraphrasing" like that.

[–] flyingjake@lemmy.one 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thank you, my pedantic friend. (I say this because I'm often the one making the comment and getting the eyerolls)

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Normally I don't point it out. But this one was just too much.

[–] MechanicalJester@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You just literally said (interpretive paraphrasing), "I like big butts and I cannot lie"

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You're/they're just paraphrasing Chaucer

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)