Personally, I just think the moral middle ground would be to be the person that slaughters and butchers the animals you eat. It would allow the most respect for all parties imo.

[–] chetradley@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (7 children)

The moral middle ground is to not kill animals (or pay someone to) if you don't need to.

[–] Skoobie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I don't know. That feels a bit off-center to me rather than middle considering one end of the spectrum is "kill nothing ever" and the other end is "How many endangered animals can I make extinct just for funsies." If everyone killed what they ate themselves, manually, I bet we'd have a bunch more vegetarians hanging around.

[–] jaackf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Surely one side would be "kill nothing" and the other would be "kill animals"?

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec 1 points 2 years ago

Right but how else will they move the goal post to get a conversational W

load more comments (4 replies)