this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
428 points (99.5% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2554 readers
811 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)
  • All men are political by nature
  • Some bears are political
  • Therefore: some bear are men
  • All A are B
  • Some C are B
  • Therefore: Some C are A

Bearistotle isnt just wrong, he's failed the simplest of syllogisms; the kind that people dont need context to parse.

[–] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That is not the correct form of a syllogism. The second premise should be "Some C are A" leading to the conclusion "Some C are B". With the structure you provided, it is easy to produce invalid conclusions from true premises:

  • All planets are round
  • Some fruits are round
  • Therefore: Some fruits are planets

Whereas a correctly structured syllogism might be:

  • All coconuts are round
  • Some fruits are coconuts
  • Therefore: Some fruits are round
[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm not saying the syllogism is correct, I'm illustrating how Bearistotle is wrong.

load more comments (5 replies)