this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

NASA

1289 readers
22 users here now

Anything related to the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration); the latest news, events, current and future missions, and more.

Note: This community is an unofficial forum and is unaffiliated with NASA or the U.S. government.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Didn’t they cut the whole project recently…?

[–] antangil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The president proposed cutting Artemis after Artemis III. Congress hasn’t yet agreed, so there’s a lot more to go and it wouldn’t affect the Artemis II launch.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

So, get one moon landing in with a project specifically designed to use a moon landing as a practice run for a mars landing with the same platform, because the platform is really expensive for a moon landing.

Jesus Christ, the stupidity. There's plenty wrong with Artemis, but it's not that part.