this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
863 points (96.5% liked)

Atheist Memes

6501 readers
6 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

From what I understand it's also still the standard in the US. Originally popularised because it would keep boys from fondling themselves which, of course, would make Sky Daddy angry.

But if that's not the case, I'd happily stand corrected by someone more knowledgeable on this topic.

[–] galanthus@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I would say that Christians are not required to circumcise themselves, since jewish law only applied to Jews before Christ, and it actually made sense to do so back then, for hygienic reasons.

I was unaware Americans do this, but first I would say that that practice is clearly not connected to Abraham, that is portrayed here, in any way, even if what you say is correct. And it is a cultural practice, not a relgious one, and even if it was, as you say, motivated by religious views.

But I... am not sure how circumcision would prevent anyone from touching himself, so I am highly sceptical of that claim.

Finally, I will say that it would be unfair to transpose the beliefs of an obscure american sect of Christianity on the entire Christendom. Especially since there is literally no religious requirement for Christians to do so.

[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But I... am not sure how circumcision would prevent anyone from touching himself, so I am highly sceptical of that claim.

The idea was, if I'm not mistaken, that without foreskin sensitivity & pleasure decreases. So that way there is less 'risk' of boys engaging in sexual activities, other than for reproductive purposes.

[–] galanthus@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Wow. If I was prompted to come up with the stupidest notion right now, I would hardly make up something dumber.

The Jews at least had a normal reason to do this(hygiene), this is ridiculous. Do you still do this?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)