this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
171 points (80.2% liked)

science

18715 readers
666 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (16 children)

I have children. The amount of trauma a two year old would experience losing their family, being transported to a foreign country and adopted by different people would be ~~traumatic~~intense as hell.

A two year old is not a newborn. That's their entire world blowing up.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Luckily it's very local, time wise. I don't remember a thing from like 5 and earlier.

[–] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting. I've got very distinct memories from back then, though they've almost become memories of memories now.

[–] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From what I understand, this is how memory works. Every time you remember something, you're actually remembering the last time you remembered it.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The medium in which memories are stored isn't exactly digital or isolated from stimulus. If something disturbs the memory, or the memory gets taken over by some other shit you learn, then I imagine the memory will take on another shape. So in essence, you are recalling a current snapshot of the memory. But the more often you recall it, the more recent and solidified/consolidated the memory will be. Just like muscle memory. The brain will make strong connections for things it uses often, because it is implied that those things are important for survival.

I'm no expert(!) but I imagine this is how it works.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)