this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
257 points (99.2% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2873 readers
919 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Pretty sure they could afford it, but would prefer not to

[–] Damage@feddit.it 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yeah, also giving it away costs them as much as just letting it rot. Yeah sure they get some brownie points but the value of those is hard to ascertain

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? They got rid of the maintenance and fuel costs on a frankly stupidly big aircraft, and bought favor from an overgrown child too stupid to realize the "Gift" to satisfy his narcissism worked in Qatar's favor.

[–] Damage@feddit.it -1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

C'mon, let's talk like adults please, don't turn Lemmy into Reddit.
Giving something away nets them nothing; they could have lowered the price until they found a buyer, or just let it rot in parking for no cost.

They did what they did to gain Trump's good will, but spinning it as "they just did it to get rid of a cost" is disingenuous... They spent the allegedly low value of the plane hoping to gain more this way than with the other options.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)