this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
931 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

70249 readers
3628 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (8 children)

but what good is that if AI can do it anyway?

It can't. It just fucking can't. We're all pretending it does, but it fundamentally can't.

https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/10/12/apples-study-proves-that-llm-based-ai-models-are-flawed-because-they-cannot-reason

Creative thinking is still a long way beyond reasoning as well. We're not close yet.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It can and it has done creative mathematical proof work. Nothing spectacular, but at least on par with a mathematics grad student.

[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Specialized AI like that is not what most people know as AI. Most people reffer to it as LLMs.

Specialized AI, like that showcased, is still decades away from generalized creative thinking. You can't ask it to do a science experiment with in a class because it just can't. It's only built for math proof.

Again, my argument is that it won't never exist.

Just that it's so far off it'd be like trying to regulate smart phone laws in the 90s. We would have only had pipe dreams as to what the tech could be, never mind its broader social context.

So tall to me when it can, in the case of this thread, clinically validated ways of teaching. We're still decades from that.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Show me a human that can do it.

[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)
load more comments (4 replies)