this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
1280 points (95.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

11687 readers
885 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 16 points 1 day ago (15 children)

I'm not disagreeing with the post, but mass transit is completely non-existent where I live. We have so far to go.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

absolutely. the debate when we were kids, and some, many in the city wanted light rail, which was ultimately voted down. my buddy who lived out in the sticks argued, it wouldn't benefit him way out there. I should have pointed out he already benefits from the sewer and water infrastructure extended to far out communities like his. should have asked him to justify why the city supports him living out there.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Rural houses around me are all on well/cistern water and septic systems. I'm not even clear how you'd run sewer way out without elevation gain towards the rural areas, isn't it largely dependent on gravity?

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They could be using lift stations if they run the sewer out that far. If the city annexed a chunk of rural land and was planning on expanding into it over the next few years they may have preemptively investing in sewers and water to help spur development.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

yes but.... imagine a massive flash flood at high elevation where they built well, but not for that

load more comments (11 replies)