this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
86 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

7449 readers
114 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago (13 children)

Or put another way, Red Hat embraces RISC-V and Rocky copies their homework. Rocky is a leech, at least use Alma.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (12 children)

That sounds personal. Why is Alma better than Rocky? I'm just curious and would never switch from my ride or die Debian.

At a quick glance, they just both seem to be spiritual successors to CentOS

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Because Rocky does every trick they can to get Red Hat source RPMs (they're the reason Red Hat put the srpms behind a paywall in the first place). CIQ then undercuts, and sells support for Rocky because they don't do any engineering and don't contribute anything upstream. Alma on the other hand bases on CentOS Stream (which is ABI compatible with RHEL) and maintains its own SIGs and contributes back to the project upstream. Rocky is a leech, but Alma actively makes entire ecosystem better.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The answer to the question you asked?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)