this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
86 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

7513 readers
191 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

That sounds personal. Why is Alma better than Rocky? I'm just curious and would never switch from my ride or die Debian.

At a quick glance, they just both seem to be spiritual successors to CentOS

[–] JoeyHarrington@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Alma works diligently to go through each srpm and ensure references to rhel are replaced with alma before building binaries. Rocky just rebrands rhel and rebuilds. Completely different!

Just kidding. I have no idea what kind of work is required to run a project like Rocky or Alma Linux and I appreciate the work both of them do. I just like to be stupid funny.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just know it's important for someone (multiple someones now) to clone the enterprise system so that anyone who wants it can have it.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

CentOS Stream is still that. There is a lot of FUD about it, but it is still ABI compatible with RHEL, it's still an unsupported community project like CentOS was, it is not a rolling release that people seem to think it is... It doesn't have a concept of minor versions, but it won't roll through major versions. RHEL will behave the exact same way if you don't set a release version.

load more comments (10 replies)