this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
40 points (95.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

11751 readers
645 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (5 children)

What seems to be known so far:

  • driver was 53-year-old white British man (a local resident)

  • 27 people taken to the hospital by ambulance

  • another 20 people were treated at the scene

  • 4 children among the injured

  • 1 adult and 1 child seriously injured

  • 4 people trapped under car, including 3 adults and 1 child

  • police are not treating the incident as terrorism


My thoughts (speculation):

This sounds like pure, unadulterated road rage. To consider that "not terrorism" implies that violence by drivers against pedestrians is "normal," not political, which of course is an absolutely car-brained POV.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I mean.....I wouldn't say it's normal, but that doesn't mean it's political.

In this case, I'd label it as terrorism even if it's not political. He intentionally drove his car into a crowd with the intent of causing harm. Political or not, that's still terrorism.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Terrorism is, by definition, political.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)