this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
62 points (97.0% liked)

UK Politics

3734 readers
55 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

George Monbiot suggests that Labour shouldn't be supported because they're now pushing right-wing policies, in his view.

So he thinks people should tactically support progressive parties who support electoral reform (Lib Dems, Greens, SNP, Plaid Cymru), which may hopefully then lead to electoral reform, so that we end up with proportional representation. Then Brits will have more choices than effectively just two parties for future elections.

Thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kux@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

honestly don't favour proportional rep in the house of commons, this opinion was cemented during the last election when a handful of prominent independent local candidates took their seat, and some nearly did (wes streeting's constituency in particular). this could not happen with party list type PR. i like the principle of a local connection to an area and wouldn't like to lose that (i know candidates get parachuted in etc but in principle)

I would prefer ranked choice voting for constituency seats, and apply PR to the house of lords instead. you could do this by counting votes for two purposes, so your vote for the local MP candidate also gets added to their party's % seats in the lords. e.g. your vote for bob smith (green) gets added to his local count, as well as his party's % allocation of lords

this is a half baked idea tbh but i quite like it so far

[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There are ranked choice PR systems, like STV.

Of course if we did get PR here it'd be the worst version that preserves the power of whips to hand out sinecures.

[–] kux@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

true but stv is multi winner so i don't think it works for a single winner local mp like e.g. irv would

i'm not necessarily opposed to the various alternatives to fptp but essentially i would want to preserve locals ability to elect a person rather than a party, obviously party would inform their choice

if we did get PR here etc

also probably + sadly true

[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, STV requires macro-wards that return several members. It does preserve candidate locality however.

You could always season with a pinch of AMS if you wanted to continue the whipping system (which frankly is as much of a mess as FPTP).

[–] kux@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

sure. i will have to read up on that but basically if it doesn't prevent a locally known + liked candidate getting elected on local issues i wouldn't be against it