this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
499 points (99.6% liked)

Music

9334 readers
711 users here now

↳ Our family Communities:

➰#Music

Music.world - !music@lemmy.world

Jazz -!jazz@lemmy.world

Album Art Porn - !albumartporn@lemmy.world

Fake Album Covers - !fakealbumcovers@lemm.ee

Obscure Music - !ObscureMusic@lemm.ee

Vinyl and LP's - !vinyl@lemmy.world

Electronic Dance Music - !edm@reddthat.com

60's Music - !60smusic@lemmy.world

70's Music - !70smusic@lemmy.world

80's Music - !80smusic@lemmy.world

90's Music - !90smusic@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The article says that Meta claims they got the rights through some third party firm that, his publisher claims had no right to authorize the distribution of their music. If that turns out to be the case, I wonder how many of the other artists that you can choose when you want to make a Reel or whatever also would fall under this same circumstance?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hey, you wanna license the Beatles? I'm your guy

$3.50 a pop.

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago

Throw in a couple of Nirvana tracks and you got yourself a deal

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)