this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
106 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

71355 readers
3354 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
106
Meta Filed a Lawsuit Against The Entity Behind CrushAI Nudify App. (about.fb.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Pro@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  • Today, we’ve filed a lawsuit against the entity behind CrushAI and are taking other steps to clamp down on nudify apps.
  • We’re building new technology to detect ads for nudify apps and sharing signals about these apps with other tech companies so they can take action too.
  • We have strict rules against non-consensual intimate imagery – whether it’s real or AI-generated – including the promotion of nudify apps.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I thought they hopped on trumps post truth wagon and removed all the fact checkers, why are they making a fuzz about this specific topic?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It (nudify) makes AI look bad and is the leading example people are using when proposing legislation to regulate AI. If they can end this prominent thing, not only do they look like they're fighting for the users, but they help keep the gvmt from meddling with whatever henious shit they want to do with AI (by removing the best argument the pro-regulation groups have right now)

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Note: this is only the best argument they have right now because politicians will never be persuaded by people bringing up Palantir's war crimes and will openly defy any constituents who are persuaded.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I think it's more that it's hard to explain why palantir's war crimes are war crimes (to the average uninformed voter, to be clear. Information warfare, what an abstract concept), but "My Child's Classmates Digitally Removed Her Clothes" is pretty easy to explain (and the country isn't divided about pedophilia even being a crime...)