this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
382 points (95.9% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historymemes@piefed.social

3515 readers
2 users here now

THIS COMM HAS MOVED

!historymemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago (5 children)

India sent hundreds-of-thousands of soldiers to the European and North African fronts, though.

[–] NaibofTabr 23 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Did India send soldiers, or did Britain send Indian ~~soldiers~~ conscripts?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The Indian Army was, at this time, actually an all-volunteer force.

[–] NaibofTabr 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So what if it were conscription? If the British forced them and they helped win an honorable war to stop fascism, how does that change the fact here that the Indian people deserve more respect and recognition for it?

Do conscripts not matter?

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago

I think the issue is India being dragged into a war by its colonizers. India would have had no reason to fight in those fronts if it wasn't for the fact it was controlled by Britain.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)