this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
301 points (94.9% liked)

Animemes

3209 readers
430 users here now

Memes related to anime. Animemes.

Rules
  1. Don't be a shithead.
  2. Posts must be a meme with anime or related to anime or weeb culture.
  3. Use NSFW tag for lewd/ecchi. No explicit hentai.
  4. Nothing illegal, copyrighted, etc
  5. Repost only if the last post is 6 months old.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soulg@ani.social 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

Yeah and he explicitly has zero interest in them sexually or romantically.

It's fucked up, yes, because it was supposed to be, but that isn't grooming.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Not a statement for or against your argument.

But grooming doesn't have to be sexual.

It is, frequently, but it's not a requirement.

For example, any of the trope recruiters that target children for military service in any of the bullshit nationalist wars (in anime of course, IRL military recruiters would never be so unethical)

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But grooming doesn't have to be sexual.

isn't that just raising children?

[–] Senal@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There is also the concept of "positive" grooming, for instance a child given specific education and resources to provide an advantage in something like politics could be said to be being "groomed" for politics or leadership.

I'd say the idea of grooming is more intentional than just regular child-raising, but that might be subjective.

As i said though, the current common usage is almost always negative and sexual in nature, it's just not a requirement.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

TIL I was groomed to be a contributing member of society and could have lived my dreams of being a strung-out braindead hippie.

I feel so violated.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)