this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
1076 points (98.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32410 readers
1 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I watched oppenheimer in emacs, u watched it in imax, we are not the same

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 11 points 2 years ago (26 children)
[–] Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev 50 points 2 years ago (22 children)

An extremely extensible text editor, there's jokes that it can do literally anything, you can play music, watch video, etc.

It's often at war with the cult of vi and the church of emacs.

[–] Weirdbeardgame@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Don't forget us nanoites. The clearly superior text editor

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't do a lot of text editing in terminal, but I used to have to at my last job and I always reached for nano and gave instructions fot nano since it's just pick up and use.

[–] heimchen@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Nano just feels sluggish as soon as you know vim keybindings. Emacs is a bit overkill for some quck edits, but nano is just to basic

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Nano is a fantastic default editor for gui-focused distros. If you aren't a command line wizard, nano is a better default because it's a lot more straightforward.

That said, nano is incredibly limited and if you have any experience with vi/vim/nvim, it's the best solution full stop. It's so much faster and more powerful but hot damn is it unintuitive for noobs.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

As a nanoite who couldn't be bothered to learn editor commands, I switched to turbo, which is essentially a linux port of the DOS text editor

[–] llii@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

Huh, interesting!

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago

I was using vim for the first time the other day and I was running through the built in vimtutor. I got a call from a friend and they asked what I was up to, and I said I was doing a tutorial for a text editor. At that moment, I felt simultaneously very silly and very smart.

[–] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

By "as soon as you know" you mean "as soon as you have put those bindings to muscle memory". Knowing them isn't really enough.

[–] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 1 points 2 years ago

Well yeah, I'd say the same concept applies to using anything tech related these days. It'd be like if you "knew" where all of the keys on a keyboard layout that you don't normally use are located - you'd still need muscle memory to actually use it efficiently.

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, again, I don't do much terminal text editing. I have an IDE. If I'm trying to help someone across the country 1000 miles away fix something on the machine I develop for, I'm going to give them instructions on something that will be incredibly easy to use. I don't want to have to explain why the arrow keys aren't working and why they have to use jkl; to navigate or explain how enter edit mode or how so save and exit. Keep it simple stupid.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)