this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
35 points (92.7% liked)

news

151 readers
466 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blave@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Judgments against corporations like this should never have a solid number. It should be a large percentage of annual profits you’re over here.

Country companies like alphabet already have a slush fund set aside to cover such expenses. These judgments against them mean absolutely nothing unless it actually hurts them.

[–] dude@lemmings.world 1 points 4 days ago

In this case Trump is a beneficiary, so I would argue it makes sense to have a solid number

load more comments (1 replies)