this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
1144 points (96.7% liked)

World News

50162 readers
3011 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world -4 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Sure, but she provided enough testimony for this niche news website to publish this story? Occam's Razor holds for now.

[–] knowone@slrpnk.net 3 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Where in the article does it say she gave testimony herself? Also it isn't that much of a niche news site, it's one of the biggest left wing news outlets in the UK, probably the second biggest after Novara

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

If she didn't give testimony, who did? Why do you insist the article is credible?

[–] knowone@slrpnk.net 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not a chatbot, you can read the article yourself and find out these things. I haven't insisted the article is credible. Go back and read what I wrote and you'll see that

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I don't understand your objection then, sorry.

[–] knowone@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

If you can't understand why someone wouldn't go out in front of the world and make big statements in line with these claims, or any statement at all, immediately after a very traumatising experience then you really need to work on your empathy and understanding of basic human emotion. I understand your skepticism, to a point. I just gave a very obvious reason why she hasn't talked about the harrowing things she went through in detail to the public straight away, whether they are as is said in this article or not. Even thinking about them is going to be very difficult for her, nevermind doing what you're expecting

Edit: Taken out a sentence that isn't relevant, as I thought you were the OP of this comment thread before

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)